Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Fanslau Ute's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fanslau Ute's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fanslau Ute's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fanslau Ute's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 15:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 13:07 | 18:08 to 05:01 | 86.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:52 | 02:53 to 02:01 | 5.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:40 | 03:03 to 02:23 | 4.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:15 | 04:20 to 04:05 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 05:09 to 04:55 | 1.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:07 | 04:24 to 04:17 | 0.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 33:08 to 33:08 | 0.0% |
| Fanslau Ute | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:06 | 00:00 | 04:57 -00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:09 | 04:06 | 05:01 +00:08 | 04:57 -00:51 |
| Running 2 | 03:57 | 09:15 | 05:17 -01:20 | 09:58 -00:43 |
| Sled Push | 03:03 | 13:12 | 02:36 +00:27 | 15:15 -02:03 |
| Running 3 | 04:13 | 16:15 | 05:33 -01:20 | 17:51 -01:36 |
| Sled Pull | 18:08 | 20:28 | 05:27 +12:41 | 23:24 -02:56 |
| Running 4 | 04:09 | 38:36 | 05:35 -01:26 | 28:51 +09:45 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:23 | 42:45 | 05:41 -01:18 | 34:26 +08:19 |
| Running 5 | 04:13 | 47:08 | 05:42 -01:29 | 40:07 +07:01 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 51:21 | 05:17 -00:11 | 45:49 +05:32 |
| Running 6 | 04:15 | 56:27 | 05:36 -01:21 | 51:06 +05:21 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:53 | 01:00:42 | 02:11 +00:42 | 56:42 +04:00 |
| Running 7 | 04:19 | 01:03:35 | 05:36 -01:17 | 58:53 +04:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:24 | 01:07:54 | 04:29 -00:05 | 01:04:29 +03:25 |
| Running 8 | 04:01 | 01:12:18 | 05:57 -01:56 | 01:08:58 +03:20 |
| Wall Balls | 04:20 | 01:16:19 | 04:36 -00:16 | 01:14:55 +01:24 |
| Roxzone | 05:24 | 01:25:54 | 06:23 -00:59 | 01:25:54 |
In terms of overall time, Ute completed the race in 01:25:54, with a total running time of 00:33:08, which is 10 minutes and 32 seconds faster than the average time. This indicates that Ute excelled in the running segments of the race and should continue to focus on her running training.
Splits Analysis:
Analyzing Ute's splits, we can identify areas where she gained or lost time compared to the average for her finish time.
In conclusion, Ute Fanslau had an impressive performance in the 2019 Hamburg HYROX race. By focusing on improving her performance in the Sled Pull, Farmers Carry, and Ski Erg segments, through specific exercises, drills, and technique corrections, she can further enhance her overall performance. Implementing pacing strategies and continuing to work on transition times will also contribute to her success in future races. Keep up the great work, Ute!
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rowan Jess | 2023 Glasgow | 01:25:50 | |
| Terjung Hannah | 2024 Hamburg | 01:25:37 | |
| D'Annibale Giovanna | 2024 Turin | 01:25:50 | |
| Rogers Taylor | 2024 Malaga | 01:26:07 | |
| Berger Nele | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:25:40 | |
| Rompel Melina | 2021 Hamburg | 01:26:02 | |
| Tausend Alexandra | 2020 Hannover | 01:25:48 | |
| Booker Kristin | 2022 Chicago | 01:26:13 | |
| Dijkzeul Luna | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:25:55 | |
| Mcbeankyle Shona | 2024 Glasgow | 01:25:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
