Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ennis Niamh's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ennis Niamh's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ennis Niamh's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ennis Niamh's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:46 | 46:30 to 43:44 | 49.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:41 | 07:07 to 05:26 | 29.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:07 | 05:29 to 04:22 | 19.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 02:07 to 02:03 | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:03 to 02:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Ennis Niamh | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:19 | 00:00 | 05:01 -00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 04:19 | 05:03 -00:29 | 05:01 -00:42 |
| Running 2 | 05:08 | 08:53 | 05:19 -00:11 | 10:04 -01:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:03 | 14:01 | 02:39 -00:36 | 15:23 -01:22 |
| Running 3 | 05:21 | 16:04 | 05:36 -00:15 | 18:02 -01:58 |
| Sled Pull | 04:35 | 21:25 | 05:31 -00:56 | 23:38 -02:13 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 26:00 | 05:39 -00:10 | 29:09 -03:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:07 | 31:29 | 05:47 +01:20 | 34:48 -03:19 |
| Running 5 | 05:49 | 38:36 | 05:46 +00:03 | 40:35 -01:59 |
| Rowing | 05:12 | 44:25 | 05:18 -00:06 | 46:21 -01:56 |
| Running 6 | 08:37 | 49:37 | 05:40 +02:57 | 51:39 -02:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 58:14 | 02:11 -00:04 | 57:19 +00:55 |
| Running 7 | 05:53 | 01:00:21 | 05:38 +00:15 | 59:30 +00:51 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:29 | 01:06:14 | 04:35 +00:54 | 01:05:08 +01:06 |
| Running 8 | 05:58 | 01:11:43 | 06:02 -00:04 | 01:09:43 +02:00 |
| Wall Balls | 04:08 | 01:17:41 | 04:44 -00:36 | 01:15:45 +01:56 |
| Roxzone | 05:22 | 01:27:03 | 06:34 -01:12 | 01:27:03 |
Niamh's total running time of 00:46:30 was 03:28 slower than the average, indicating that she may need to focus on improving her running speed and endurance. Her best running lap was 00:04:19, which was 00:31 faster than the average, demonstrating her ability to maintain a strong pace during certain segments of the race.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, Niamh can enhance her performance in future Hyrox races and continue to achieve impressive results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rijsdijk Mirjam | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:26:33 | |
| Inciong Sarah | 2023 Chicago | 01:26:58 | |
| Andren Mel | 2024 Dallas | 01:26:58 | |
| Wallace Ellie | 2023 Birmingham | 01:27:22 | |
| Lundback Linda | 2023 Stockholm | 01:26:48 | |
| Ocvirk Eva | 2024 Paris | 01:27:16 | |
| Deutsch Sonja | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:26:45 | |
| Findlay Lucy | 2022 London | 01:26:53 | |
| Tingle Dawn | 2024 Madrid | 01:26:42 | |
| Balint Claudia | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:27:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Dallas | 01:27:04 | |
| 2021 New York | 01:20:12 | |
| 2022 New York | 01:23:48 | |
| 2020 Chicago | 01:31:21 | |
| 2021 Dallas | 01:37:48 | |
| 2022 Las Vegas | 01:30:21 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
