Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bi Nazia's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bi Nazia's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bi Nazia's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bi Nazia's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:20. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:20 | 07:32 to 06:12 | 40.0% |
| Wall Balls | 01:07 | 05:58 to 04:51 | 33.5% |
| Rowing | 00:22 | 05:45 to 05:23 | 11.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:21 | 05:11 to 04:50 | 10.5% |
| Run Total | 00:07 | 46:52 to 46:45 | 3.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:45 to 02:43 | 1.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 05:08 to 05:07 | 0.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:57 to 01:57 | 0.0% |
| Bi Nazia | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:02 | 00:00 | 05:16 +00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:08 | 06:02 | 05:11 -00:03 | 05:16 +00:46 |
| Running 2 | 05:13 | 11:10 | 05:39 -00:26 | 10:27 +00:43 |
| Sled Push | 02:45 | 16:23 | 02:52 -00:07 | 16:06 +00:17 |
| Running 3 | 05:37 | 19:08 | 05:58 -00:21 | 18:58 +00:10 |
| Sled Pull | 05:35 | 24:45 | 06:03 -00:28 | 24:56 -00:11 |
| Running 4 | 05:50 | 30:20 | 06:00 -00:10 | 30:59 -00:39 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:32 | 36:10 | 06:36 +00:56 | 36:59 -00:49 |
| Running 5 | 06:08 | 43:42 | 06:10 -00:02 | 43:35 +00:07 |
| Rowing | 05:45 | 49:50 | 05:27 +00:18 | 49:45 +00:05 |
| Running 6 | 05:58 | 55:35 | 06:03 -00:05 | 55:12 +00:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 01:01:33 | 02:22 -00:25 | 01:01:15 +00:18 |
| Running 7 | 05:49 | 01:03:30 | 06:03 -00:14 | 01:03:37 -00:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:11 | 01:09:19 | 05:03 +00:08 | 01:09:40 -00:21 |
| Running 8 | 06:18 | 01:14:30 | 06:33 -00:15 | 01:14:43 -00:13 |
| Wall Balls | 05:58 | 01:20:48 | 05:17 +00:41 | 01:21:16 -00:28 |
| Roxzone | 07:09 | 01:33:49 | 07:16 -00:07 | 01:33:49 |
Nazia Bi performed exceptionally well in her age group, finishing in the top 16% of her category. Her overall time was impressive at 01:33:49, and she stood out particularly in her total running time, which was faster than average by 01:03. This suggests that she is a strong runner. However, Nazia's performance indicates that she may have started the race a bit slower than average in the first running segment, but she managed to recover quickly and maintain a faster pace throughout the rest of the race.
In terms of race strategy, Nazia could benefit from a more aggressive start on the initial running segments to take full advantage of her running skills. She should also focus on maintaining a consistent pace throughout the race to avoid burnout in later segments. Additionally, she should work on her transitions between segments to minimize rest time and maintain momentum. Lastly, incorporating more strength training into her routine will help her perform better in the strength-demanding segments like the Wall Balls and Burpees Broad Jump.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Benbow Kirsten | 2022 Birmingham | 01:34:06 | |
| Kros Anne | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:33:19 | |
| Gedzelman Yael | 2019 New York | 01:33:46 | |
| Sorce Rebecca | 2022 Chicago | 01:34:04 | |
| Zeinstra Sanne | 2024 Maastricht | 01:33:56 | |
| Kettenis Wendy | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:34:14 | |
| Dönnecke Tanja | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:34:01 | |
| Hamilton Alicia | 2022 Chicago | 01:33:23 | |
| Barth Vivien | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:33:59 | |
| Frenette Veera | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:34:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:47:01 | |
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:43:19 | |
| 2024 London | 01:40:51 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
