Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bagby Nathan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bagby Nathan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bagby Nathan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bagby Nathan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:53 | 45:02 to 42:09 | 62.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:50 | 05:33 to 04:43 | 18.2% |
| Rowing | 00:17 | 05:03 to 04:46 | 6.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 | 02:21 to 02:05 | 5.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 04:37 to 04:24 | 4.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:06 | 02:52 to 02:46 | 2.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Bagby Nathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:00 | 00:00 | 04:42 -00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 04:00 | 04:28 +00:09 | 04:42 -00:42 |
| Running 2 | 05:08 | 08:37 | 05:01 +00:07 | 09:10 -00:33 |
| Sled Push | 02:52 | 13:45 | 02:57 -00:05 | 14:11 -00:26 |
| Running 3 | 05:45 | 16:37 | 05:27 +00:18 | 17:08 -00:31 |
| Sled Pull | 05:33 | 22:22 | 05:01 +00:32 | 22:35 -00:13 |
| Running 4 | 06:13 | 27:55 | 05:27 +00:46 | 27:36 +00:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:06 | 34:08 | 05:24 -00:18 | 33:03 +01:05 |
| Running 5 | 06:17 | 39:14 | 05:37 +00:40 | 38:27 +00:47 |
| Rowing | 05:03 | 45:31 | 04:51 +00:12 | 44:04 +01:27 |
| Running 6 | 05:49 | 50:34 | 05:29 +00:20 | 48:55 +01:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 56:23 | 02:13 +00:08 | 54:24 +01:59 |
| Running 7 | 05:45 | 58:44 | 05:27 +00:18 | 56:37 +02:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:54 | 01:04:29 | 05:11 -00:17 | 01:02:04 +02:25 |
| Running 8 | 06:09 | 01:09:23 | 06:06 +00:03 | 01:07:15 +02:08 |
| Wall Balls | 05:18 | 01:15:32 | 06:37 -01:19 | 01:13:21 +02:11 |
| Roxzone | 06:21 | 01:27:02 | 07:04 -00:43 | 01:27:02 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that Nathan excels in certain segments such as the Sled Push and Sandbag Lunges, where he was faster than the average time. However, he struggled in segments like Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, Rowing, Running 3, and Ski Erg, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
Nathan's total running time of 00:45:02 was 03:29 slower than the average, indicating that he may need to focus on improving his running fitness and speed. Additionally, his Roxzone time of 00:06:21 was 00:27 faster than average, suggesting that he may have taken longer rest periods or transitions during the race. To improve this segment, Nathan should work on improving his overall fitness and transition time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hildebrandt Dirk | 2019 Hamburg | 01:27:09 | |
| Ng Eugene | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:26:37 | |
| Soppoth David | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:26:59 | |
| Lieberam Jan | 2022 Bremen | 01:27:17 | |
| Harrison Lloyd | 2024 Dubai | 01:27:26 | |
| Wells Shane | 2024 Brisbane | 01:26:57 | |
| ONeill Aaron | 2024 Dublin | 01:27:32 | |
| Salaris Mattia | 2024 Milan | 01:26:34 | |
| Dhondt JeanClaude | 2024 Paris | 01:26:58 | |
| Sinclair Josh | 2024 Birmingham | 01:27:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:17:37 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:19:28 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
