Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Williams Greg's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Williams Greg's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Williams Greg's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Williams Greg's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:11 | 07:05 to 04:54 | 37.1% |
| Run Total | 01:55 | 45:06 to 43:11 | 32.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:51 | 03:00 to 02:09 | 14.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:34 | 07:02 to 06:28 | 9.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:22 | 05:29 to 05:07 | 6.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:18 to 02:18 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:50 to 03:50 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Williams Greg | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:37 | 00:00 | 04:45 -00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 04:37 | 04:29 -00:04 | 04:45 -00:08 |
| Running 2 | 05:06 | 09:02 | 05:06 +00:00 | 09:14 -00:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:18 | 14:08 | 03:00 -00:42 | 14:20 -00:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:40 | 16:26 | 05:33 +00:07 | 17:20 -00:54 |
| Sled Pull | 07:05 | 22:06 | 05:08 +01:57 | 22:53 -00:47 |
| Running 4 | 05:35 | 29:11 | 05:33 +00:02 | 28:01 +01:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:50 | 34:46 | 05:38 -01:48 | 33:34 +01:12 |
| Running 5 | 06:26 | 38:36 | 05:44 +00:42 | 39:12 -00:36 |
| Rowing | 04:26 | 45:02 | 04:53 -00:27 | 44:56 +00:06 |
| Running 6 | 05:21 | 49:28 | 05:35 -00:14 | 49:49 -00:21 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:00 | 54:49 | 02:16 +00:44 | 55:24 -00:35 |
| Running 7 | 05:26 | 57:49 | 05:34 -00:08 | 57:40 +00:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:29 | 01:03:15 | 05:23 +00:06 | 01:03:14 +00:01 |
| Running 8 | 06:59 | 01:08:44 | 06:15 +00:44 | 01:08:37 +00:07 |
| Wall Balls | 07:02 | 01:15:43 | 06:50 +00:12 | 01:14:52 +00:51 |
| Roxzone | 06:20 | 01:28:59 | 07:17 -00:57 | 01:28:59 |
Greg's total running time of 00:45:06 was 02:43 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap was 00:04:37, which was only 00:01 slower than the average.
- Transitions: Improving transition times can significantly impact overall race performance. Greg should practice efficient and quick transitions between exercises to minimize time spent in the roxzone. Incorporating specific transition drills into his training routine can help improve his speed and efficiency during these moments.
- Strength and Endurance Balance: As Greg's total running time was slower than average, he should focus on incorporating more running-specific workouts into his training routine. However, he should not neglect his strength training, as it plays a crucial role in Hyrox races. Striking a balance between running and strength training will help him excel in both aspects of the race.
In summary, while Greg Williams performed well in the Hyrox race in Birmingham, there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, transition times, and targeting specific segments for improvement, Greg can further elevate his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gillett Ben | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:28:39 | |
| Domański Maciej | 2024 Poznan | 01:28:42 | |
| Connor Dan | 2023 London | 01:29:06 | |
| Challis Rob | 2024 Manchester | 01:28:47 | |
| Burke Dan | 2023 Singapore | 01:29:29 | |
| Morrin Stephen | 2024 Melbourne | 01:28:41 | |
| Chavez Rivera Francisco Javier | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:29:17 | |
| Després Louis | 2024 Paris | 01:28:30 | |
| Gager Alexander | 2023 München | 01:28:32 | |
| Cerda Manuel | 2024 New York | 01:29:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:09:27 | |
| 2022 London | 01:12:08 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:08:32 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:12:19 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:07:12 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:13:26 | |
| 2022 London | 01:17:50 | |
| 2022 Manchester | 01:21:33 | |
| 2024 Poznan | 01:29:31 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
