Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Vissers Steven's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Vissers Steven's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Vissers Steven's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Vissers Steven's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:02 | 51:29 to 45:27 | 93.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:20 | 05:53 to 05:33 | 5.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 03:12 to 03:07 | 1.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:55 to 01:55 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:05 to 07:05 | 0.0% |
| Vissers Steven | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:36 | 00:00 | 04:54 -01:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 03:36 | 04:34 -00:11 | 04:54 -01:18 |
| Running 2 | 08:12 | 07:59 | 05:20 +02:52 | 09:28 -01:29 |
| Sled Push | 03:12 | 16:11 | 03:12 +00:00 | 14:48 +01:23 |
| Running 3 | 08:25 | 19:23 | 05:52 +02:33 | 18:00 +01:23 |
| Sled Pull | 05:10 | 27:48 | 05:30 -00:20 | 23:52 +03:56 |
| Running 4 | 08:25 | 32:58 | 05:50 +02:35 | 29:22 +03:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:18 | 41:23 | 06:08 -01:50 | 35:12 +06:11 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 45:41 | 06:03 -00:22 | 41:20 +04:21 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 51:22 | 05:00 -00:14 | 47:23 +03:59 |
| Running 6 | 05:22 | 56:08 | 05:52 -00:30 | 52:23 +03:45 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:55 | 01:01:30 | 02:24 -00:29 | 58:15 +03:15 |
| Running 7 | 05:31 | 01:03:25 | 05:52 -00:21 | 01:00:39 +02:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:53 | 01:08:56 | 05:44 +00:09 | 01:06:31 +02:25 |
| Running 8 | 06:20 | 01:14:49 | 06:40 -00:20 | 01:12:15 +02:34 |
| Wall Balls | 07:05 | 01:21:09 | 07:26 -00:21 | 01:18:55 +02:14 |
| Roxzone | 06:08 | 01:34:16 | 07:55 -01:47 | 01:34:16 |
In terms of pacing, Vissers showed good consistency throughout the race. His splits analysis reveals that he maintained a relatively steady pace in most segments, with some minor fluctuations. However, there were a few segments where he lost significant time, namely Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, and Sandbag Lunges.
In conclusion, Steven Vissers had a solid performance in the 2023 Amsterdam Hyrox race. While he demonstrated good consistency in his pace, there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance in future races. Specifically, focusing on improving his running performance in segments like Running 2, Running 3, and Running 4, as well as strengthening his lower body for Sandbag Lunges, will be key. Implementing strategic race strategies, optimizing transitions, and incorporating targeted strength and conditioning exercises will help Vissers reach his full potential in future competitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Maggio Igno | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:34:33 | |
| Fitzgerald Paul | 2023 Manchester | 01:34:22 | |
| Garcia Ruben | 2023 Chicago | 01:34:14 | |
| Riva Kevin | 2024 Turin | 01:34:42 | |
| Surian Debon Ruben | 2023 Barcelona | 01:34:42 | |
| Johnson Adrian | 2024 Brisbane | 01:34:17 | |
| Uceda Vicente | 2023 Valencia | 01:34:45 | |
| Klootwijk Theo | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:34:00 | |
| Caune Philip | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:34:43 | |
| Elmer Greg | 2021 Chicago | 01:33:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
