Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Veggel David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Veggel David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Veggel David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Veggel David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:53 | 52:26 to 48:33 | 85.7% |
| Rowing | 00:37 | 05:45 to 05:08 | 13.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:02 | 05:55 to 05:53 | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:56 to 02:56 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:37 to 05:37 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:17 to 02:17 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:32 to 05:32 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:29 to 07:29 | 0.0% |
| Van Veggel David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:18 | 00:00 | 05:10 -00:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 04:18 | 04:41 -00:06 | 05:10 -00:52 |
| Running 2 | 06:00 | 08:53 | 05:40 +00:20 | 09:51 -00:58 |
| Sled Push | 02:56 | 14:53 | 03:30 -00:34 | 15:31 -00:38 |
| Running 3 | 06:14 | 17:49 | 06:16 -00:02 | 19:01 -01:12 |
| Sled Pull | 05:55 | 24:03 | 06:02 -00:07 | 25:17 -01:14 |
| Running 4 | 06:38 | 29:58 | 06:14 +00:24 | 31:19 -01:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:37 | 36:36 | 06:47 -01:10 | 37:33 -00:57 |
| Running 5 | 06:53 | 42:13 | 06:31 +00:22 | 44:20 -02:07 |
| Rowing | 05:45 | 49:06 | 05:11 +00:34 | 50:51 -01:45 |
| Running 6 | 06:53 | 54:51 | 06:20 +00:33 | 56:02 -01:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:17 | 01:01:44 | 02:36 -00:19 | 01:02:22 -00:38 |
| Running 7 | 07:15 | 01:04:01 | 06:19 +00:56 | 01:04:58 -00:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:32 | 01:11:16 | 06:19 -00:47 | 01:11:17 -00:01 |
| Running 8 | 08:18 | 01:16:48 | 07:25 +00:53 | 01:17:36 -00:48 |
| Wall Balls | 07:29 | 01:25:06 | 08:16 -00:47 | 01:25:01 +00:05 |
| Roxzone | 09:44 | 01:42:11 | 08:54 +00:50 | 01:42:11 |
David Van Veggel delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 60% overall and top 53% in his age group. With an overall time of 01:42:11, his total running time was slightly slower than average, indicating room for improvement in this area. The analysis of the initial running segments suggests that David started strong but gradually slowed down, which may indicate pacing issues. Despite the slower running segments, David demonstrated strong performance in strength-based exercises, such as the Sled Push and Burpees Broad Jump, showcasing a balanced fitness profile with a slight edge towards strength.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Whiteford Andrew | 2023 Glasgow | 01:42:40 | |
| 한 상준 | 2024 Incheon | 01:42:24 | |
| Koe Lionel | 2023 Melbourne | 01:42:05 | |
| Wu Benny | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:41:51 | |
| Salorian Ryan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:41:55 | |
| Busch Alexander | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:42:06 | |
| Goddard Elliott | 2024 Melbourne | 01:41:55 | |
| Miraglia Dario | 2024 Milan | 01:42:37 | |
| Robertson Michael | 2021 Los Angeles | 01:41:42 | |
| Hanson Michael | 2024 Birmingham | 01:42:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:58:21 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 02:00:11 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 02:02:50 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
