Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Lent William's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Lent William's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Lent William's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Lent William's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:24 | 44:53 to 41:29 | 76.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:27 | 05:15 to 04:48 | 10.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:18 | 06:19 to 06:01 | 6.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:16 | 04:38 to 04:22 | 6.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:02 | 04:38 to 04:36 | 0.7% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:44 to 04:43 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:57 to 01:57 | 0.0% |
| Van Lent William | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:31 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 05:31 | 04:26 +00:12 | 04:35 +00:56 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 10:09 | 04:57 +00:03 | 09:01 +01:08 |
| Sled Push | 02:07 | 15:09 | 02:52 -00:45 | 13:58 +01:11 |
| Running 3 | 05:24 | 17:16 | 05:23 +00:01 | 16:50 +00:26 |
| Sled Pull | 04:38 | 22:40 | 04:54 -00:16 | 22:13 +00:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:35 | 27:18 | 05:21 +00:14 | 27:07 +00:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:48 | 32:53 | 05:17 -00:29 | 32:28 +00:25 |
| Running 5 | 05:56 | 37:41 | 05:31 +00:25 | 37:45 -00:04 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 43:37 | 04:49 -00:05 | 43:16 +00:21 |
| Running 6 | 05:26 | 48:21 | 05:22 +00:04 | 48:05 +00:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 53:47 | 02:10 -00:13 | 53:27 +00:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:30 | 55:44 | 05:22 +00:08 | 55:37 +00:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:15 | 01:01:14 | 05:05 +00:10 | 01:00:59 +00:15 |
| Running 8 | 06:34 | 01:06:29 | 05:58 +00:36 | 01:06:04 +00:25 |
| Wall Balls | 06:19 | 01:13:03 | 06:29 -00:10 | 01:12:02 +01:01 |
| Roxzone | 06:04 | 01:25:19 | 06:48 -00:44 | 01:25:19 |
To improve his performance in these segments, William should focus on the following training strategies and techniques:
1. Run Total and Running 1: William's total running time and the first running segment were slower than average. To improve his running performance, he should incorporate interval training and speed work into his training routine. This can include high-intensity interval training (HIIT) sessions, hill sprints, and tempo runs. Additionally, focusing on improving his running form and technique can help optimize his running efficiency.
2. Best Lap and Running 8: William's best lap time and the eighth running segment were both slower than average. To improve his performance in these segments, he should work on his endurance and stamina. Incorporating long-distance runs and endurance training into his routine can help improve his overall running endurance. Additionally, incorporating strength training exercises specific to the muscles used in running, such as lunges, squats, and calf raises, can help improve his running performance.
3. Running 5 and Ski Erg: William's fifth running segment and performance on the Ski Erg were slower than average. To improve in these areas, he should focus on improving his cardiovascular fitness and leg strength. This can be achieved through exercises such as cycling, stair climbing, and plyometric exercises like jump squats. Additionally, incorporating interval training on the Ski Erg can help improve his performance in this segment.
4. Running 4 and Sandbag Lunges: William's fourth running segment and performance in the Sandbag Lunges were not as strong as the average. To improve in these areas, he should focus on building strength and endurance in his lower body. Incorporating exercises such as lunges, squats, and deadlifts can help improve his leg strength. Additionally, practicing sandbag lunges specifically, with proper form and technique, can help him improve his performance in this segment.
In conclusion, William Van Lent showed a strong performance in the 2024 Maastricht Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve. By implementing specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and form corrections, he can enhance his performance in the identified segments. Additionally, focusing on pacing, efficient transitions, and a hybrid training approach can lead to overall improvement in his race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tröger Markus | 2019 Hamburg | 01:25:25 | |
| Winget Taylor | 2024 Anaheim | 01:24:51 | |
| Schneider Stephan | 2022 Essen | 01:24:57 | |
| Sutheran Tom | 2023 London | 01:25:40 | |
| Liebhart Eric | 2018 Leipzig | 01:25:04 | |
| Barton Michael | 2023 London | 01:25:09 | |
| Olsson Jan | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:25:39 | |
| Lum Rafael | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:24:58 | |
| Kershaw George | 2024 Glasgow | 01:24:59 | |
| De Wit Roan | 2022 Maastricht | 01:25:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:31:10 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:36:51 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
