Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 87 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Scott Aaron's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Scott Aaron's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Scott Aaron's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Scott Aaron's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 22:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 15:37 | 01:15:16 to 59:39 | 68.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:43 | 12:09 to 08:26 | 16.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:31 | 12:38 to 09:07 | 15.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:40 to 03:40 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:16 to 05:16 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:20 to 02:20 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:32 to 08:32 | 0.0% |
| Scott Aaron | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:13 | 00:00 | 06:23 -01:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 05:13 | 05:16 -00:41 | 06:23 -01:10 |
| Running 2 | 10:34 | 09:48 | 07:12 +03:22 | 11:39 -01:51 |
| Sled Push | 03:40 | 20:22 | 05:06 -01:26 | 18:51 +01:31 |
| Running 3 | 09:09 | 24:02 | 08:22 +00:47 | 23:57 +00:05 |
| Sled Pull | 05:15 | 33:11 | 08:34 -03:19 | 32:19 +00:52 |
| Running 4 | 09:37 | 38:26 | 08:26 +01:11 | 40:53 -02:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 12:38 | 48:03 | 10:00 +02:38 | 49:19 -01:16 |
| Running 5 | 10:09 | 01:00:41 | 08:51 +01:18 | 59:19 +01:22 |
| Rowing | 05:16 | 01:10:50 | 05:52 -00:36 | 01:08:10 +02:40 |
| Running 6 | 09:07 | 01:16:06 | 08:22 +00:45 | 01:14:02 +02:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:20 | 01:25:13 | 03:26 -01:06 | 01:22:24 +02:49 |
| Running 7 | 08:44 | 01:27:33 | 08:27 +00:17 | 01:25:50 +01:43 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 12:09 | 01:36:17 | 09:45 +02:24 | 01:34:17 +02:00 |
| Running 8 | 12:47 | 01:48:26 | 11:26 +01:21 | 01:44:02 +04:24 |
| Wall Balls | 08:32 | 02:01:13 | 13:20 -04:48 | 01:55:28 +05:45 |
| Roxzone | 12:21 | 02:21:57 | 13:09 -00:48 | 02:21:57 |
Competing in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event, Aaron Scott put up a commendable performance, ranking in the top 56% out of 1404 athletes. In his age group (40-44), he emerged in the top 60% among 216 athletes. Aaron's total running time was 01:15:16, slower than the average by 07:44, indicating a need to enhance his running abilities. His pacing seemed inconsistent, starting faster than average in running 1 but slowing down in the subsequent running segments. This inconsistency suggests that Aaron is more strength-based, given his excellent performance in strength-based exercises such as Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Rowing, Farmers Carry, and Wall Balls.
Aaron should aim to maintain a steady pace throughout the race, rather than starting too fast and slowing down in later segments. He should focus on maintaining a consistent running pace which will allow him to conserve energy for the strength-based segments, where he naturally excels. Implementing a more strategic pacing plan can help improve his overall time and ranking. Additionally, he should also work on his transition times to ensure minimal time loss during these periods.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spurlock James | 2023 Chicago | 02:21:54 | |
| Tomar Pranav | 2020 Hannover | 02:21:58 | |
| Nash Terry | 2024 Birmingham | 02:22:10 | |
| Marcus Clive | 2023 London | 02:21:48 | |
| Gonzalez Robert | 2023 Miami | 02:21:33 | |
| Richter Charlie | 2023 Chicago | 02:22:22 | |
| Shirodkar Santosh | 2024 Malaga | 02:22:02 | |
| Weatherhead Seamus | 2023 Dublin | 02:21:58 | |
| Duran Carlos | 2023 Dallas | 02:22:14 | |
| Afolabi Sunday | 2023 Houston | 02:22:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
