Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Schild Jan Willem's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Schild Jan Willem's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Schild Jan Willem's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Schild Jan Willem's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:48 | 47:54 to 44:06 | 78.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:00 | 06:35 to 05:35 | 20.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:03 | 05:20 to 05:17 | 1.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:46 to 02:46 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Schild Jan Willem | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:42 | 00:00 | 04:48 -01:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:08 | 03:42 | 04:32 -00:24 | 04:48 -01:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:40 | 07:50 | 05:12 +00:28 | 09:20 -01:30 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 13:30 | 03:05 -00:19 | 14:32 -01:02 |
| Running 3 | 06:21 | 16:16 | 05:41 +00:40 | 17:37 -01:21 |
| Sled Pull | 04:35 | 22:37 | 05:17 -00:42 | 23:18 -00:41 |
| Running 4 | 06:18 | 27:12 | 05:39 +00:39 | 28:35 -01:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:35 | 33:30 | 05:52 +00:43 | 34:14 -00:44 |
| Running 5 | 06:26 | 40:05 | 05:52 +00:34 | 40:06 -00:01 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 46:31 | 04:56 -00:16 | 45:58 +00:33 |
| Running 6 | 06:19 | 51:11 | 05:41 +00:38 | 50:54 +00:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 57:30 | 02:18 -00:28 | 56:35 +00:55 |
| Running 7 | 06:14 | 59:20 | 05:40 +00:34 | 58:53 +00:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:20 | 01:05:34 | 05:32 -00:12 | 01:04:33 +01:01 |
| Running 8 | 06:57 | 01:10:54 | 06:23 +00:34 | 01:10:05 +00:49 |
| Wall Balls | 04:56 | 01:17:51 | 07:06 -02:10 | 01:16:28 +01:23 |
| Roxzone | 08:25 | 01:31:05 | 07:31 +00:54 | 01:31:05 |
Jan Willem Schild delivered a strong performance, ranking in the top 44% overall and top 46% in his age group. Despite a respectable overall finish time of 01:31:05, his total running time was 2:32 slower than average, indicating room for improvement in running efficiency. His running splits suggest an initial strong pace, as evidenced by Running 1 being 1:01 faster than average but a noticeable slow down in subsequent runs. This pattern suggests a potential pacing issue, with a tendency to start too fast. Jan's performance in strength-based exercises, particularly Wall Balls and Farmers Carry, was excellent, highlighting a strength-oriented profile. His Roxzone time was slower than average, indicating a need to improve fitness and transition efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pino Ruiz Francisco Jesus | 2023 Malaga | 01:31:28 | |
| Silvano Gabriele | 2024 Milan | 01:30:53 | |
| Bristol Corbin | 2024 Melbourne | 01:30:57 | |
| Canning Anthony | 2024 Berlin | 01:30:36 | |
| Rivas Berdegue Imanol | 2024 Bilbao | 01:30:50 | |
| Macnab Ross | 2023 London | 01:31:23 | |
| Miles Joel | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:30:53 | |
| Campbell Oliver | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:31:35 | |
| Radu Cristian | 2022 Wien | 01:31:02 | |
| Ng Ashley | 2024 Singapore | 01:31:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:30:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
