Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Farmers Carry | 00:41 (From 02:41 to 02:00) | 27.5% |
| BBJ | 00:39 (From 05:30 to 04:51) | 26.2% |
| Run Total | 00:26 (From 41:24 to 40:58) | 17.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:25 (From 03:03 to 02:38) | 16.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:18 (From 04:49 to 04:31) | 12.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:08 to 04:08) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:42 to 04:42) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 04:41 to 04:41) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 05:40 to 05:40) | 0.0% |
| Rennie Steven | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:25 | 00:00 | 04:34 +00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:08 | 05:25 | 04:25 -00:17 | 04:34 +00:51 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 09:33 | 04:53 -00:08 | 08:59 +00:34 |
| Sled Push | 03:03 | 14:18 | 02:52 +00:11 | 13:52 +00:26 |
| Running 3 | 04:52 | 17:21 | 05:19 -00:27 | 16:44 +00:37 |
| Sled Pull | 04:49 | 22:13 | 04:50 -00:01 | 22:03 +00:10 |
| Running 4 | 07:09 | 27:02 | 05:16 +01:53 | 26:53 +00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:30 | 34:11 | 05:10 +00:20 | 32:09 +02:02 |
| Running 5 | 05:06 | 39:41 | 05:26 -00:20 | 37:19 +02:22 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 44:47 | 04:47 -00:05 | 42:45 +02:02 |
| Running 6 | 04:55 | 49:29 | 05:18 -00:23 | 47:32 +01:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:41 | 54:24 | 02:08 +00:33 | 52:50 +01:34 |
| Running 7 | 05:02 | 57:05 | 05:17 -00:15 | 54:58 +02:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:41 | 01:02:07 | 04:59 -00:18 | 01:00:15 +01:52 |
| Running 8 | 04:14 | 01:06:48 | 05:52 -01:38 | 01:05:14 +01:34 |
| Wall Balls | 05:40 | 01:11:02 | 06:17 -00:37 | 01:11:06 -00:04 |
| Roxzone | 07:28 | 01:24:02 | 06:39 +00:49 | 01:24:02 |
Steven Rennie's performance in the 2024 Milan Hyrox race was commendable, especially considering his age category. He finished with an overall rank of 480th out of 1371 athletes, placing him in the top 35%. Within his age group (40-44), he ranked 56th out of 180 athletes, achieving a top 31% finish. His total running time was 56 seconds faster than average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, there were discrepancies in his pacing, with the initial running segments being slower, suggesting a conservative start. Conversely, his final lap was significantly faster, perhaps indicating untapped potential or overly cautious initial pacing. Overall, Steven exhibits strong running capabilities but could benefit from additional strength training to balance his performance profile.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Van Dongen Bram | 2022 Maastricht | 01:24:03 | |
| Penfound Jack | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:24:08 | |
| Pesselse Geert | 2024 Maastricht | 01:24:05 | |
| Wróblewski Adrian | 2024 Poznan | 01:24:09 | |
| Bakkoury Ayoub | 2024 Manchester | 01:23:52 | |
| Zurlo Antonio | 2024 Milan | 01:24:32 | |
| Hage Steffen | 2022 Basel | 01:23:54 | |
| Broughton Adam | 2024 New York | 01:24:04 | |
| Curtis Jude | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:24:19 | |
| Murphy Ben | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow Rennie Steven | 01:21:56 | |
| 2024 Milan Rennie Steven, Macdonald Laura | 01:23:13 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Rennie Steven
