Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Frankfurt using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Reiber Thomas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Reiber Thomas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Reiber Thomas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Reiber Thomas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:48 | 43:47 to 40:59 | 58.9% |
| Sled Pull | 01:31 | 06:02 to 04:31 | 31.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:33 to 04:21 | 4.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:10 | 04:52 to 04:42 | 3.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:04 | 05:57 to 05:53 | 1.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:32 to 01:32 | 0.0% |
| Reiber Thomas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:55 | 00:00 | 04:33 +00:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 04:55 | 04:25 +00:08 | 04:33 +00:22 |
| Running 2 | 05:06 | 09:28 | 04:53 +00:13 | 08:58 +00:30 |
| Sled Push | 02:06 | 14:34 | 02:52 -00:46 | 13:51 +00:43 |
| Running 3 | 05:41 | 16:40 | 05:19 +00:22 | 16:43 -00:03 |
| Sled Pull | 06:02 | 22:21 | 04:50 +01:12 | 22:02 +00:19 |
| Running 4 | 05:39 | 28:23 | 05:17 +00:22 | 26:52 +01:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:15 | 34:02 | 05:10 -00:55 | 32:09 +01:53 |
| Running 5 | 05:47 | 38:17 | 05:27 +00:20 | 37:19 +00:58 |
| Rowing | 04:26 | 44:04 | 04:47 -00:21 | 42:46 +01:18 |
| Running 6 | 05:34 | 48:30 | 05:18 +00:16 | 47:33 +00:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:32 | 54:04 | 02:09 -00:37 | 52:51 +01:13 |
| Running 7 | 05:30 | 55:36 | 05:18 +00:12 | 55:00 +00:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:52 | 01:01:06 | 04:59 -00:07 | 01:00:18 +00:48 |
| Running 8 | 05:39 | 01:05:58 | 05:52 -00:13 | 01:05:17 +00:41 |
| Wall Balls | 05:57 | 01:11:37 | 06:17 -00:20 | 01:11:09 +00:28 |
| Roxzone | 06:37 | 01:24:02 | 06:36 +00:01 | 01:24:02 |
In terms of his profile, Thomas seems to have a balanced skill set with a slight preference for strength exercises. His running time of 00:43:47 is 03:03 slower than the average, indicating that he could benefit from focusing more on his running abilities.
Additionally, Thomas should strategize his transitions between exercises to minimize the time spent in the roxzone. This can be achieved by practicing efficient transitions during his training sessions. He should aim to minimize rest time and improve his overall fitness to reduce the time spent in the roxzone.
In conclusion, Thomas Reiber had a strong performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve for future races. By focusing on his running abilities, strengthening his upper body and core, and implementing efficient race strategies, Thomas can enhance his overall performance and achieve even better results in future competitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Collins Sam | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:23:55 | |
| Grant Lewis | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:23:48 | |
| Rolland Benjamin | 2024 Marseille | 01:24:29 | |
| Annetts Stuart | 2024 Madrid | 01:24:32 | |
| Mwaura Lawrence | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:23:52 | |
| Moss Justin | 2024 New York | 01:24:00 | |
| Lanigan Lee | 2023 Dublin | 01:23:35 | |
| Meyer Frank | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:24:07 | |
| Delattre John | 2023 Paris | 01:24:19 | |
| Weston Daniel | 2022 London | 01:23:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
