Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2018 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Peters Oliver's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Peters Oliver's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Peters Oliver's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Peters Oliver's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 05:00 | 13:00 to 08:00 | 87.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:45 | 06:54 to 06:09 | 13.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:20 to 02:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:34 to 05:34 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:30 to 05:30 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:57 to 04:57 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:48 to 01:48 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 45:56 to 45:56 | 0.0% |
| Peters Oliver | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:29 | 00:00 | 05:08 -00:39 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 04:29 | 04:40 -00:10 | 05:08 -00:39 |
| Running 2 | 05:40 | 08:59 | 05:41 -00:01 | 09:48 -00:49 |
| Sled Push | 02:20 | 14:39 | 03:30 -01:10 | 15:29 -00:50 |
| Running 3 | 06:22 | 16:59 | 06:14 +00:08 | 18:59 -02:00 |
| Sled Pull | 05:34 | 23:21 | 05:59 -00:25 | 25:13 -01:52 |
| Running 4 | 05:46 | 28:55 | 06:15 -00:29 | 31:12 -02:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:30 | 34:41 | 06:42 -01:12 | 37:27 -02:46 |
| Running 5 | 05:52 | 40:11 | 06:29 -00:37 | 44:09 -03:58 |
| Rowing | 04:57 | 46:03 | 05:10 -00:13 | 50:38 -04:35 |
| Running 6 | 05:48 | 51:00 | 06:16 -00:28 | 55:48 -04:48 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 56:48 | 02:34 -00:46 | 01:02:04 -05:16 |
| Running 7 | 05:36 | 58:36 | 06:17 -00:41 | 01:04:38 -06:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:54 | 01:04:12 | 06:16 +00:38 | 01:10:55 -06:43 |
| Running 8 | 06:25 | 01:11:06 | 07:25 -01:00 | 01:17:11 -06:05 |
| Wall Balls | 13:00 | 01:17:31 | 08:11 +04:49 | 01:24:36 -07:05 |
| Roxzone | 11:04 | 01:41:35 | 08:48 +02:16 | 01:41:35 |
Oliver's performance in the race indicates that he has a good overall fitness level. His total running time was faster than average, suggesting that he has a strong running profile. However, he did lose some time in certain segments, particularly the Wall Balls, Roxzone, and Sandbag Lunges.
In conclusion, Oliver Peters had a strong overall performance in the Hyrox race in Hamburg. While his running profile was a strength, there are areas for improvement, including Wall Balls, Roxzone, and Sandbag Lunges. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as strength exercises, form corrections, and improved transitions, Oliver can enhance his performance in these segments. Implementing race strategies such as pacing, efficient transitions, and mental preparation will also contribute to his overall improvement in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cooke Cain | 2024 Melbourne | 01:42:00 | |
| Santana Barroso Miguel | 2023 Barcelona | 01:41:35 | |
| Greig Derek | 2023 London | 01:41:44 | |
| Beeston John | 2021 Birmingham | 01:41:52 | |
| Freeman Paul | 2024 Glasgow | 01:41:42 | |
| Kenny Patrick | 2024 Dublin | 01:41:46 | |
| Teoh Nicky | 2024 Singapore | 01:41:41 | |
| Pickem Christian | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:41:37 | |
| Holdstock Adam | 2024 Manchester | 01:41:32 | |
| Bennett Scott | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:41:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
