Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pearce James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pearce James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pearce James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pearce James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:22 | 08:19 to 05:57 | 50.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:15 | 08:24 to 07:09 | 26.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:37 | 06:12 to 05:35 | 13.1% |
| Run Total | 00:15 | 45:55 to 45:40 | 5.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:32 to 02:19 | 4.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:59 to 02:59 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Pearce James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:23 | 00:00 | 04:59 -01:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:16 | 03:23 | 04:35 -00:19 | 04:59 -01:36 |
| Running 2 | 05:39 | 07:39 | 05:23 +00:16 | 09:34 -01:55 |
| Sled Push | 02:59 | 13:18 | 03:12 -00:13 | 14:57 -01:39 |
| Running 3 | 06:20 | 16:17 | 05:53 +00:27 | 18:09 -01:52 |
| Sled Pull | 04:37 | 22:37 | 05:30 -00:53 | 24:02 -01:25 |
| Running 4 | 06:15 | 27:14 | 05:52 +00:23 | 29:32 -02:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:19 | 33:29 | 06:12 +02:07 | 35:24 -01:55 |
| Running 5 | 06:15 | 41:48 | 06:05 +00:10 | 41:36 +00:12 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 48:03 | 05:02 -00:20 | 47:41 +00:22 |
| Running 6 | 06:09 | 52:45 | 05:54 +00:15 | 52:43 +00:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:32 | 58:54 | 02:24 +00:08 | 58:37 +00:17 |
| Running 7 | 07:04 | 01:01:26 | 05:53 +01:11 | 01:01:01 +00:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:12 | 01:08:30 | 05:49 +00:23 | 01:06:54 +01:36 |
| Running 8 | 04:54 | 01:14:42 | 06:47 -01:53 | 01:12:43 +01:59 |
| Wall Balls | 08:24 | 01:19:36 | 07:29 +00:55 | 01:19:30 +00:06 |
| Roxzone | 07:10 | 01:35:01 | 08:02 -00:52 | 01:35:01 |
James Pearce displayed a strong performance in the HYROX Dublin 2024, finishing in the top 50% of all athletes and his age group. James particularly excelled in his running segments, with his total running time notably being 01:03 faster than the average. This suggests that James has a runner's profile and shows strength in these sections of the race. Specifically, his best running lap was recorded at 00:04:54, a commendable time.
His pacing, however, shows some inconsistency. James started the race at a fast pace, finishing Running 1 significantly faster than the average. However, his speed decreased in the later running segments, especially Running 7 which was 01:09 slower than average. This indicates that James may have started the race too fast, consequently affecting his performance in later sections.
Despite James's overall strong performance, there are a few segments where he lagged behind the average times. These include the Burpees Broad Jump, Wall Balls, Sandbag Lunges, and Farmers Carry. Improving on these areas could greatly enhance his overall performance.
James's Roxzone time was faster than average, suggesting he had a quick transition between exercises. However, there is still room for improvement. High-intensity interval training could help James maintain his energy and speed throughout the race.
James should consider implementing a more consistent pace throughout the race, rather than starting too fast and slowing down in later segments. This could involve setting specific time targets for each running segment and aiming to stay within these targets.
Additionally, focusing on his form during the strength segments could help improve efficiency and speed. For example, ensuring proper form during the Burpees Broad Jump and Wall Balls could help conserve energy and prevent injuries.
Lastly, incorporating more strength training into his routine will help balance his performance, as James currently shows a stronger profile in running. This could involve adding more weight training sessions into his weekly training schedule.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Steggles Matthew | 2023 London | 01:35:25 | |
| Gräve Sascha | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:34:56 | |
| Lorenzen Patrick | 2018 Hamburg | 01:34:32 | |
| Mcculloch Shaun | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:54 | |
| Uceda Vicente | 2023 Valencia | 01:34:45 | |
| Svensson David | 2024 Malaga | 01:34:39 | |
| Griffoen Stefan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:34:34 | |
| Cooper Max | 2022 London | 01:34:53 | |
| Inacio Steve | 2023 Paris | 01:35:18 | |
| Bathel André | 2021 Hamburg | 01:35:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:28:35 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:51:34 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
