Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:18 (From 47:08 to 42:50) | 77.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:42 (From 05:33 to 04:51) | 12.7% |
| Rowing | 00:24 (From 05:12 to 04:48) | 7.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:08 (From 06:30 to 06:22) | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:22 to 04:22) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:18 to 02:18) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 03:49 to 03:49) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 01:56 to 01:56) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 04:53 to 04:53) | 0.0% |
| Oelker Nelson | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:02 | 00:00 | 04:44 -00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 04:02 | 04:29 -00:07 | 04:44 -00:42 |
| Running 2 | 05:43 | 08:24 | 05:05 +00:38 | 09:13 -00:49 |
| Sled Push | 02:18 | 14:07 | 03:00 -00:42 | 14:18 -00:11 |
| Running 3 | 07:01 | 16:25 | 05:32 +01:29 | 17:18 -00:53 |
| Sled Pull | 05:33 | 23:26 | 05:06 +00:27 | 22:50 +00:36 |
| Running 4 | 06:15 | 28:59 | 05:31 +00:44 | 27:56 +01:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:49 | 35:14 | 05:37 -01:48 | 33:27 +01:47 |
| Running 5 | 06:02 | 39:03 | 05:42 +00:20 | 39:04 -00:01 |
| Rowing | 05:12 | 45:05 | 04:52 +00:20 | 44:46 +00:19 |
| Running 6 | 06:08 | 50:17 | 05:33 +00:35 | 49:38 +00:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 56:25 | 02:15 -00:19 | 55:11 +01:14 |
| Running 7 | 05:57 | 58:21 | 05:32 +00:25 | 57:26 +00:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:53 | 01:04:18 | 05:21 -00:28 | 01:02:58 +01:20 |
| Running 8 | 06:03 | 01:09:11 | 06:12 -00:09 | 01:08:19 +00:52 |
| Wall Balls | 06:30 | 01:15:14 | 06:47 -00:17 | 01:14:31 +00:43 |
| Roxzone | 06:53 | 01:28:29 | 07:11 -00:18 | 01:28:29 |
In terms of running, Oelker had a total running time of 00:47:08, which was 04:54 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time. However, his best running lap time of 00:04:02 was 00:31 faster than average, showcasing his speed and agility.
To improve performance in these segments, it is recommended that Oelker incorporate specific training strategies and techniques. For running, he can focus on interval training, incorporating both speed work and endurance runs. This will help improve his overall running speed and stamina.
In terms of strength exercises, Oelker can incorporate exercises such as squats, lunges, and deadlifts to strengthen his lower body. This will improve his running performance and help him maintain a steady pace throughout the race.
Additionally, Oelker can work on his form and technique during the running segments. This includes maintaining proper posture, engaging the core, and focusing on efficient stride length and cadence. Incorporating drills such as high knees, butt kicks, and lateral movements can also help improve his running technique and speed.
Oelker should also pay attention to his transitions between segments, as the Roxzone time was slightly faster than average. However, he can still work on improving his transition time to minimize any time lost during the race.
Furthermore, Oelker should focus on maintaining a consistent effort throughout the race, especially during the running segments. By pacing himself appropriately and conserving energy, he can ensure a strong finish and potentially improve his overall ranking.
Overall, Oelker's performance in the 2023 Chicago Hyrox race was commendable. With specific training strategies, techniques, and race strategies in place, he can continue to improve and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Abaclat Andrea | 2024 Milan | 01:28:19 | |
| Agnew Seamus | 2024 Dublin | 01:28:41 | |
| Romero Requena Michael | 2022 Madrid | 01:28:47 | |
| Smith Shaun | 2024 Brisbane | 01:28:26 | |
| Peck Stuart Dalgleish | 2023 London | 01:28:05 | |
| Van Der Grijn Jelle | 2024 Berlin | 01:28:34 | |
| Hitzel Manuel | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:28:52 | |
| Oczachowski Sławomir | 2024 Poznan | 01:28:18 | |
| Neild Adam | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:28:58 | |
| Abbott Henry | 2024 New York | 01:28:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Oelker Nelson
