Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mulligan James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mulligan James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mulligan James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mulligan James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:32 | 05:39 to 04:07 | 35.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:24 | 05:32 to 04:08 | 32.1% |
| Run Total | 01:05 | 38:47 to 37:42 | 24.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:16 | 04:27 to 04:11 | 6.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:03 | 04:01 to 03:58 | 1.1% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:32 to 04:30 | 0.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:38 to 01:38 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Mulligan James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:27 | 00:00 | 04:18 +00:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 04:27 | 04:19 +00:08 | 04:18 +00:09 |
| Running 2 | 04:29 | 08:54 | 04:34 -00:05 | 08:37 +00:17 |
| Sled Push | 02:04 | 13:23 | 02:37 -00:33 | 13:11 +00:12 |
| Running 3 | 04:42 | 15:27 | 04:57 -00:15 | 15:48 -00:21 |
| Sled Pull | 04:01 | 20:09 | 04:22 -00:21 | 20:45 -00:36 |
| Running 4 | 04:55 | 24:10 | 04:55 +00:00 | 25:07 -00:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:39 | 29:05 | 04:35 +01:04 | 30:02 -00:57 |
| Running 5 | 04:58 | 34:44 | 05:03 -00:05 | 34:37 +00:07 |
| Rowing | 04:32 | 39:42 | 04:37 -00:05 | 39:40 +00:02 |
| Running 6 | 04:59 | 44:14 | 04:57 +00:02 | 44:17 -00:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:38 | 49:13 | 01:59 -00:21 | 49:14 -00:01 |
| Running 7 | 04:55 | 50:51 | 04:55 +00:00 | 51:13 -00:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:32 | 55:46 | 04:30 +01:02 | 56:08 -00:22 |
| Running 8 | 05:24 | 01:01:18 | 05:23 +00:01 | 01:00:38 +00:40 |
| Wall Balls | 05:03 | 01:06:42 | 05:40 -00:37 | 01:06:01 +00:41 |
| Roxzone | 05:51 | 01:17:30 | 05:49 +00:02 | 01:17:30 |
James Mulligan delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne HYROX event, securing an overall rank of 254, placing him in the top 14% of participants. In his age group (35-39), he ranked 55 out of 378 athletes, again placing him in the top 14%. His total running time of 38:47 was notably 38 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong running capability, while his strength exercises showed mixed results. James demonstrated a strong pace in the initial running segments, but he might have started slightly below his potential pace, as indicated by his performance in Running 1. Overall, James exhibits a hybrid profile with strengths in both running and strength-based exercises, but with room to improve in specific strength segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stewart Todd | 2021 Dallas | 01:17:27 | |
| Hughan Gavin | 2024 Manchester | 01:17:21 | |
| Cameron Craig | 2023 Glasgow | 01:17:36 | |
| McCollum Tim | 2023 Dallas | 01:17:06 | |
| Dąbrowski Mariusz | 2024 Poznan | 01:17:40 | |
| Kooiman Sander | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:17:39 | |
| Horbacz Ivan | 2024 Manchester | 01:17:54 | |
| De La Fuente Carrillo Miguel | 2024 Madrid | 01:17:51 | |
| Franke Tim | 2024 Köln | 01:17:11 | |
| Truelsen Bjørn | 2024 Malaga | 01:17:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
