Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mccutcheon Connor's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mccutcheon Connor's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mccutcheon Connor's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mccutcheon Connor's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:44. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:44 | 52:51 to 49:07 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:32 to 02:32 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:09 to 05:09 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:40 to 06:40 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:18 to 02:18 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:47 to 05:47 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:24 to 07:24 | 0.0% |
| Mccutcheon Connor | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:06 | 00:00 | 05:12 +00:54 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 06:06 | 04:42 -00:23 | 05:12 +00:54 |
| Running 2 | 05:31 | 10:25 | 05:43 -00:12 | 09:54 +00:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:32 | 15:56 | 03:30 -00:58 | 15:37 +00:19 |
| Running 3 | 05:55 | 18:28 | 06:18 -00:23 | 19:07 -00:39 |
| Sled Pull | 05:09 | 24:23 | 06:04 -00:55 | 25:25 -01:02 |
| Running 4 | 06:56 | 29:32 | 06:17 +00:39 | 31:29 -01:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:40 | 36:28 | 06:56 -00:16 | 37:46 -01:18 |
| Running 5 | 07:01 | 43:08 | 06:32 +00:29 | 44:42 -01:34 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 50:09 | 05:12 -00:11 | 51:14 -01:05 |
| Running 6 | 06:33 | 55:10 | 06:22 +00:11 | 56:26 -01:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 01:01:43 | 02:35 -00:17 | 01:02:48 -01:05 |
| Running 7 | 06:16 | 01:04:01 | 06:20 -00:04 | 01:05:23 -01:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:47 | 01:10:17 | 06:25 -00:38 | 01:11:43 -01:26 |
| Running 8 | 08:37 | 01:16:04 | 07:29 +01:08 | 01:18:08 -02:04 |
| Wall Balls | 07:24 | 01:24:41 | 08:22 -00:58 | 01:25:37 -00:56 |
| Roxzone | 11:08 | 01:43:04 | 09:05 +02:03 | 01:43:04 |
Connor Mccutcheon delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, finishing within the top 55% of all athletes and within the top 56% of his age category. Despite his slower total running time, Connor has shown considerable strength in his exercise segments, often finishing faster than average. Notably, his Ski Erg and Sled Push performances were significantly above average, indicating a robust strength profile. However, his longer time spent in the Roxzone suggests room for improvement in transition efficiency and overall fitness.
For better race performance, Connor should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rowland Stuart | 2024 Taipei | 01:42:47 | |
| Bimmel Ramon | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:42:51 | |
| Kelbie Matthew | 2024 Manchester | 01:43:14 | |
| Harris Charlie | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:43:31 | |
| Tuda Marco | 2023 Köln | 01:43:29 | |
| Schlimgen Paul | 2024 Maastricht | 01:43:25 | |
| Auvert Eduardo | 2024 Malaga | 01:43:15 | |
| Lee Austin | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:42:54 | |
| Nedevski Alex | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:42:52 | |
| Krainz Johannes | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:43:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:46:11 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
