Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mccarthy Liam's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mccarthy Liam's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mccarthy Liam's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mccarthy Liam's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:06 | 05:33 to 04:27 | 34.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:50 | 05:03 to 04:13 | 26.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:29 | 05:56 to 05:27 | 15.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:26 | 04:50 to 04:24 | 13.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 04:30 to 04:16 | 7.4% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:40 to 04:35 | 2.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:27 to 02:27 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:27 to 01:27 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:40 to 38:40 | 0.0% |
| Mccarthy Liam | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:37 | 00:00 | 04:23 +00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 04:37 | 04:21 +00:09 | 04:23 +00:14 |
| Running 2 | 04:17 | 09:07 | 04:44 -00:27 | 08:44 +00:23 |
| Sled Push | 02:27 | 13:24 | 02:44 -00:17 | 13:28 -00:04 |
| Running 3 | 04:44 | 15:51 | 05:07 -00:23 | 16:12 -00:21 |
| Sled Pull | 05:03 | 20:35 | 04:34 +00:29 | 21:19 -00:44 |
| Running 4 | 04:47 | 25:38 | 05:06 -00:19 | 25:53 -00:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:33 | 30:25 | 04:54 +00:39 | 30:59 -00:34 |
| Running 5 | 04:52 | 35:58 | 05:15 -00:23 | 35:53 +00:05 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 40:50 | 04:41 -00:01 | 41:08 -00:18 |
| Running 6 | 04:54 | 45:30 | 05:08 -00:14 | 45:49 -00:19 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:27 | 50:24 | 02:03 -00:36 | 50:57 -00:33 |
| Running 7 | 05:18 | 51:51 | 05:06 +00:12 | 53:00 -01:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:50 | 57:09 | 04:44 +00:06 | 58:06 -00:57 |
| Running 8 | 05:16 | 01:01:59 | 05:35 -00:19 | 01:02:50 -00:51 |
| Wall Balls | 05:56 | 01:07:15 | 05:57 -00:01 | 01:08:25 -01:10 |
| Roxzone | 07:27 | 01:20:30 | 06:08 +01:19 | 01:20:30 |
Liam Mccarthy's performance at the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event was commendable. He ranked in the top 23% of all athletes and in the top 28% in his age group. His overall time was impressive, clocking in at 01:20:30. A significant highlight was his total running time, which was 01:58 faster than the average, suggesting a strong runner profile.
Upon analyzing his splits, it appears that Liam began the race slightly slower than average, but quickly made up time in the subsequent segments. From running 2 to running 5, Liam consistently finished faster than the average, indicating a sensible pacing strategy and strong endurance. However, it's worth noting that his time in the Roxzone was slower than average, suggesting that more time was spent transitioning between exercise zones or resting.
Based on the performance analysis, here are a few strategies that could be implemented to further improve Liam's performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Duke Austin | 2023 Dallas | 01:20:43 | |
| Mueller Tom | 2024 Melbourne | 01:20:26 | |
| Stacey Liam | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:20:19 | |
| Egremy Philippe | 2024 Marseille | 01:20:58 | |
| Ang Kenneth | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:20:35 | |
| Young Aidan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:31 | |
| Ayres Ollie | 2022 London | 01:20:18 | |
| Liao Yuansheng | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:20:42 | |
| Whitt Tyler | 2024 Dallas | 01:20:17 | |
| Chisholm Brad | 2020 Dallas | 01:20:40 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
