Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Klausmann Marc's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Klausmann Marc's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Klausmann Marc's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Klausmann Marc's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:29 | 42:11 to 38:42 | 66.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:34 | 02:25 to 01:51 | 10.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:32 | 04:50 to 04:18 | 10.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:30 | 02:54 to 02:24 | 9.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:22 to 04:14 | 2.5% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:35 to 04:34 | 0.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:43 to 03:43 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:43 to 03:43 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Klausmann Marc | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:38 | 00:00 | 04:20 +00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 04:38 | 04:20 +00:02 | 04:20 +00:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:10 | 09:00 | 04:40 +00:30 | 08:40 +00:20 |
| Sled Push | 02:54 | 14:10 | 02:41 +00:13 | 13:20 +00:50 |
| Running 3 | 05:31 | 17:04 | 05:04 +00:27 | 16:01 +01:03 |
| Sled Pull | 03:43 | 22:35 | 04:29 -00:46 | 21:05 +01:30 |
| Running 4 | 05:30 | 26:18 | 05:03 +00:27 | 25:34 +00:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:43 | 31:48 | 04:45 -01:02 | 30:37 +01:11 |
| Running 5 | 05:24 | 35:31 | 05:11 +00:13 | 35:22 +00:09 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 40:55 | 04:40 -00:05 | 40:33 +00:22 |
| Running 6 | 05:22 | 45:30 | 05:04 +00:18 | 45:13 +00:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:25 | 50:52 | 02:02 +00:23 | 50:17 +00:35 |
| Running 7 | 05:10 | 53:17 | 05:03 +00:07 | 52:19 +00:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:50 | 58:27 | 04:38 +00:12 | 57:22 +01:05 |
| Running 8 | 05:30 | 01:03:17 | 05:31 -00:01 | 01:02:00 +01:17 |
| Wall Balls | 05:03 | 01:08:47 | 05:49 -00:46 | 01:07:31 +01:16 |
| Roxzone | 05:39 | 01:19:20 | 06:00 -00:21 | 01:19:20 |
In terms of his splits, it is important to note that Marc lost the most time in the following segments: Run Total, Running 2, Best Lap, Running 3, Running 4, Running 1, Farmers Carry, Running 6, Sandbag Lunges, and Running 5.
10. Running 5: Marc was 00:14 slower than the average in this segment. To improve his performance in running 5, he should focus on improving his speed and endurance. Incorporating speed workouts such as interval training and fartlek runs can help improve his speed, while longer distance runs can improve his endurance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Menten Marius | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:19:11 | |
| Stubbe Niklas | 2023 Hamburg | 01:19:11 | |
| Scheihing Frank | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:19:19 | |
| Daniel Marian | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:19:09 | |
| Kirchner Dan | 2024 New York | 01:19:06 | |
| Byrnes Tony | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:24 | |
| Schult Guido | 2019 Leipzig | 01:19:24 | |
| Puschiasis Alessandro | 2023 Milan | 01:19:49 | |
| Diston Darren | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:19:46 | |
| Beggan Mel | 2024 Madrid | 01:18:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:28:09 | |
| 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:22:11 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
