Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Janssen Roy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Janssen Roy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Janssen Roy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Janssen Roy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:19 | 45:36 to 44:17 | 50.3% |
| Sled Push | 01:18 | 04:17 to 02:59 | 49.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:03 to 04:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:08 to 02:08 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:54 to 05:54 | 0.0% |
| Janssen Roy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:39 | 00:00 | 04:48 +00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:03 | 05:39 | 04:33 -00:30 | 04:48 +00:51 |
| Running 2 | 05:16 | 09:42 | 05:16 +00:00 | 09:21 +00:21 |
| Sled Push | 04:17 | 14:58 | 03:08 +01:09 | 14:37 +00:21 |
| Running 3 | 06:24 | 19:15 | 05:46 +00:38 | 17:45 +01:30 |
| Sled Pull | 05:04 | 25:39 | 05:23 -00:19 | 23:31 +02:08 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 30:43 | 05:44 -00:21 | 28:54 +01:49 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:18 | 36:06 | 05:58 -01:40 | 34:38 +01:28 |
| Running 5 | 05:28 | 40:24 | 05:56 -00:28 | 40:36 -00:12 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 45:52 | 04:58 -00:17 | 46:32 -00:40 |
| Running 6 | 05:33 | 50:33 | 05:47 -00:14 | 51:30 -00:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 56:06 | 02:22 -00:14 | 57:17 -01:11 |
| Running 7 | 05:20 | 58:14 | 05:44 -00:24 | 59:39 -01:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:02 | 01:03:34 | 05:34 -00:32 | 01:05:23 -01:49 |
| Running 8 | 06:37 | 01:08:36 | 06:31 +00:06 | 01:10:57 -02:21 |
| Wall Balls | 05:54 | 01:15:13 | 07:13 -01:19 | 01:17:28 -02:15 |
| Roxzone | 11:22 | 01:32:21 | 07:40 +03:42 | 01:32:21 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that Roy struggled in certain segments, particularly the Roxzone, Run Total, Running 1, Sled Push, Best Lap, and Running 3. These segments accounted for the most time lost during the race.
- Hybrid Profile: Given his slower running times compared to the average, Roy should prioritize training his running ability. Incorporating more running-specific workouts and drills into his training routine will help improve his overall running performance.
- Transitions: Roy should focus on improving his transition times during the race. Practicing quick and efficient transitions between exercises in training will help him save valuable time during the race.
In conclusion, Roy Janssen performed well in the 2024 Maastricht HYROX race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, reducing transition times, and incorporating specific training strategies tailored to his weaknesses, Roy can continue to progress and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mears Gary | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:32:36 | |
| Platt Ward | 2023 Singapore | 01:32:51 | |
| Mcmurray Bryce | 2022 London | 01:32:32 | |
| Kao Chris | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:32:36 | |
| Chapman Sonny | 2024 London | 01:32:42 | |
| Stockdale George | 2024 London | 01:32:01 | |
| Violleau Benjamin | 2023 Paris | 01:32:49 | |
| Fürst Sven | 2022 Essen | 01:32:32 | |
| Haase Frank | 2023 Hannover | 01:32:28 | |
| Miller Ryan | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:32:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
