Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Jaggar Kyle's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Jaggar Kyle's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Jaggar Kyle's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Jaggar Kyle's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:21 | 46:40 to 41:19 | 83.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:57 | 05:52 to 04:55 | 14.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:07 to 02:01 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:40 to 02:40 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:31 to 03:31 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:56 to 03:56 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:32 to 05:32 | 0.0% |
| Jaggar Kyle | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:47 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:02 | 04:47 | 04:25 -00:23 | 04:35 +00:12 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 08:49 | 04:54 +00:13 | 09:00 -00:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 13:56 | 02:52 -00:12 | 13:54 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:52 | 16:36 | 05:21 +00:31 | 16:46 -00:10 |
| Sled Pull | 03:31 | 22:28 | 04:51 -01:20 | 22:07 +00:21 |
| Running 4 | 05:49 | 25:59 | 05:20 +00:29 | 26:58 -00:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:52 | 31:48 | 05:14 +00:38 | 32:18 -00:30 |
| Running 5 | 05:59 | 37:40 | 05:30 +00:29 | 37:32 +00:08 |
| Rowing | 04:11 | 43:39 | 04:47 -00:36 | 43:02 +00:37 |
| Running 6 | 06:04 | 47:50 | 05:21 +00:43 | 47:49 +00:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 53:54 | 02:09 -00:02 | 53:10 +00:44 |
| Running 7 | 06:09 | 56:01 | 05:20 +00:49 | 55:19 +00:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:56 | 01:02:10 | 05:01 -01:05 | 01:00:39 +01:31 |
| Running 8 | 06:56 | 01:06:06 | 05:55 +01:01 | 01:05:40 +00:26 |
| Wall Balls | 05:32 | 01:13:02 | 06:24 -00:52 | 01:11:35 +01:27 |
| Roxzone | 06:12 | 01:24:39 | 06:40 -00:28 | 01:24:39 |
In terms of his splits, Kyle had a total running time of 00:46:40, which was 05:45 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time to perform better in the roxzone. It is also worth noting that his best running lap was 00:04:47, which was 00:22 slower than average.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, Kyle Jaggar can enhance his performance in future HYROX races. Consistent training, attention to technique, and proper race strategies will contribute to his success as a fitness athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bailey Mike | 2024 London | 01:24:52 | |
| Heaven Adam | 2024 Paris | 01:24:42 | |
| Stephan James | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:03 | |
| Krowinkel Peter | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:24:35 | |
| Palenik Pawel | 2023 Madrid | 01:25:08 | |
| Jackson David | 2023 Dubai | 01:24:23 | |
| Pearson Chris | 2024 Manchester | 01:24:14 | |
| Fotherby Alex | 2023 London | 01:24:47 | |
| Gillick Mike | 2023 Birmingham | 01:24:53 | |
| Campbell Anthony | 2024 Marseille | 01:24:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
