Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Harmsen Bart's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Harmsen Bart's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Harmsen Bart's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Harmsen Bart's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 11:17. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 05:13 | 10:10 to 04:57 | 46.2% |
| Run Total | 04:00 | 47:22 to 43:22 | 35.5% |
| Wall Balls | 01:12 | 07:42 to 06:30 | 10.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:52 | 03:45 to 02:53 | 7.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Harmsen Bart | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:02 | 00:00 | 04:47 -00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:04 | 04:02 | 04:30 -00:26 | 04:47 -00:45 |
| Running 2 | 04:57 | 08:06 | 05:06 -00:09 | 09:17 -01:11 |
| Sled Push | 03:45 | 13:03 | 03:03 +00:42 | 14:23 -01:20 |
| Running 3 | 05:27 | 16:48 | 05:35 -00:08 | 17:26 -00:38 |
| Sled Pull | 10:10 | 22:15 | 05:11 +04:59 | 23:01 -00:46 |
| Running 4 | 05:37 | 32:25 | 05:34 +00:03 | 28:12 +04:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:48 | 38:02 | 05:42 -00:54 | 33:46 +04:16 |
| Running 5 | 05:30 | 42:50 | 05:45 -00:15 | 39:28 +03:22 |
| Rowing | 04:33 | 48:20 | 04:53 -00:20 | 45:13 +03:07 |
| Running 6 | 05:47 | 52:53 | 05:35 +00:12 | 50:06 +02:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 58:40 | 02:17 -00:27 | 55:41 +02:59 |
| Running 7 | 05:23 | 01:00:30 | 05:34 -00:11 | 57:58 +02:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:05 | 01:05:53 | 05:24 -00:19 | 01:03:32 +02:21 |
| Running 8 | 05:43 | 01:10:58 | 06:16 -00:33 | 01:08:56 +02:02 |
| Wall Balls | 07:42 | 01:16:41 | 06:54 +00:48 | 01:15:12 +01:29 |
| Roxzone | 05:09 | 01:29:24 | 07:18 -02:09 | 01:29:24 |
One area of improvement that stands out is Bart's total running time, which was 4 minutes and 58 seconds slower than the average. This suggests that Bart should focus on improving his overall fitness and his transition time between exercise zones (roxzone). By enhancing his overall fitness, Bart will be able to maintain a faster pace throughout the race, resulting in a better running performance.
In conclusion, Bart Harmsen performed well in the 2022 Maastricht Hyrox race, but there are areas for improvement. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, transition time, and specific segments such as the sled pull and wall balls, Bart can enhance his performance in future races. Implementing strategies for pacing, efficient transitions, and mental preparation will also contribute to Bart's success.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dijkstra Reint | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:29:51 | |
| Digier Quentin | 2023 Paris | 01:28:57 | |
| Wong Anson | 2023 Singapore | 01:29:45 | |
| Young Kyland | 2023 Anaheim | 01:29:41 | |
| Morgan Curtis | 2024 Manchester | 01:29:17 | |
| Entwistle Tim | 2024 Manchester | 01:29:13 | |
| Bonal Adame Oliver | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:29:50 | |
| Harignordoquy Peio | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:29:32 | |
| Porcel Balaguer Juan | 2022 München | 01:29:11 | |
| Ackroyd Philip | 2022 Birmingham | 01:29:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Essen | 01:22:40 | |
| 2019 Essen | 01:27:58 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:16:51 | |
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:23:43 | |
| 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:17:22 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:29:38 | |
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:23:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
