Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:31 (From 07:29 to 05:58) | 31.3% |
| Sled Push | 01:29 (From 04:09 to 02:40) | 30.6% |
| BBJ | 01:04 (From 06:00 to 04:56) | 22.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:33 (From 05:08 to 04:35) | 11.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 (From 04:36 to 04:22) | 4.8% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:32 to 04:32) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 01:43 to 01:43) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 04:31 to 04:31) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 39:30 to 39:30) | 0.0% |
| Green Michael | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:46 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:49 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:36 | 03:46 | 04:25 +00:11 | 04:35 -00:49 |
| Running 2 | 04:28 | 08:22 | 04:54 -00:26 | 09:00 -00:38 |
| Sled Push | 04:09 | 12:50 | 02:51 +01:18 | 13:54 -01:04 |
| Running 3 | 05:12 | 16:59 | 05:21 -00:09 | 16:45 +00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 05:08 | 22:11 | 04:50 +00:18 | 22:06 +00:05 |
| Running 4 | 04:53 | 27:19 | 05:19 -00:26 | 26:56 +00:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:00 | 32:12 | 05:13 +00:47 | 32:15 -00:03 |
| Running 5 | 05:09 | 38:12 | 05:30 -00:21 | 37:28 +00:44 |
| Rowing | 04:32 | 43:21 | 04:47 -00:15 | 42:58 +00:23 |
| Running 6 | 05:15 | 47:53 | 05:21 -00:06 | 47:45 +00:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:43 | 53:08 | 02:08 -00:25 | 53:06 +00:02 |
| Running 7 | 05:04 | 54:51 | 05:20 -00:16 | 55:14 -00:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:31 | 59:55 | 05:01 -00:30 | 01:00:34 -00:39 |
| Running 8 | 05:48 | 01:04:26 | 05:55 -00:07 | 01:05:35 -01:09 |
| Wall Balls | 07:29 | 01:10:14 | 06:23 +01:06 | 01:11:30 -01:16 |
| Roxzone | 07:02 | 01:24:36 | 06:43 +00:19 | 01:24:36 |
Michael's total running time of 00:39:30 was particularly impressive, as it was 01:27 faster than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he has a strong running profile and excelled in this aspect of the race. His best running lap of 00:03:46 was also noteworthy, as it was 00:39 faster than the average.
For the Burpees Broad Jump segment, Michael was 01:07 slower than the average. To improve in this area, he should focus on increasing his upper body strength and explosive power. Exercises such as push-ups, pull-ups, and plyometric movements like box jumps can help improve his performance. Additionally, practicing the proper form and technique for the burpee and broad jump will be crucial for efficiency during the race.
The Wall Balls segment was another area where Michael struggled, finishing 01:04 slower than the average. To improve in this segment, he should focus on developing his lower body strength and endurance. Exercises such as squats, lunges, and kettlebell swings can help strengthen the muscles used in wall balls. Additionally, practicing proper form and technique, including using the hips and legs to generate power, will be important for more efficient performance.
The Sled Push segment was another area where Michael lost time, finishing 01:00 slower than the average. To improve in this segment, he should focus on building lower body strength and improving his pushing technique. Exercises such as squats, deadlifts, and sled pushes can help develop the necessary strength and power. Additionally, practicing proper body positioning and pushing mechanics during training will be crucial for improved performance.
The Roxzone segment, which is the transition time between exercise zones, was slower than average for Michael, taking him 00:36 longer than the average athlete. To improve in this area, he should focus on improving his overall fitness and reducing transition time. Incorporating high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and circuit training into his training routine can help improve his cardiovascular endurance and efficiency during transitions.
Lastly, the Ski Erg segment was another area where Michael lost time, finishing 00:15 slower than the average. To improve in this segment, he should focus on developing his upper body and core strength. Exercises such as rowing, pull-ups, and planks can help strengthen the muscles used in the Ski Erg. Additionally, practicing proper technique and form, including maintaining a steady and efficient rhythm, will be important for improved performance.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on specific areas of improvement, Michael can continue to enhance his performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Latorre Matt | 2021 Birmingham | 01:24:44 | |
| Mateja Radoslaw | 2023 Hamburg | 01:24:44 | |
| Doris Michael | 2023 London | 01:24:31 | |
| Mcreynolds Matthew | 2021 Dallas | 01:25:03 | |
| Weaver Kennon | 2022 Dallas | 01:24:29 | |
| Butler Jason | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:42 | |
| Frohberg Florian | 2022 Leipzig | 01:24:11 | |
| Wallón Jocke | 2023 Stockholm | 01:24:30 | |
| Kling Bram | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:24:54 | |
| Morales Galicia Miguel | 2024 Bilbao | 01:24:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Green Michael
