Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Fitzgerald Martin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fitzgerald Martin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fitzgerald Martin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fitzgerald Martin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:02 | 06:42 to 05:40 | 26.7% |
| Run Total | 01:00 | 47:05 to 46:05 | 25.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:48 | 03:59 to 03:11 | 20.7% |
| Rowing | 00:32 | 05:31 to 04:59 | 13.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:28 | 06:31 to 06:03 | 12.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:24 to 02:22 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Fitzgerald Martin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:20 | 00:00 | 04:58 +00:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:09 | 05:20 | 04:36 -00:27 | 04:58 +00:22 |
| Running 2 | 05:01 | 09:29 | 05:23 -00:22 | 09:34 -00:05 |
| Sled Push | 03:59 | 14:30 | 03:13 +00:46 | 14:57 -00:27 |
| Running 3 | 05:34 | 18:29 | 05:52 -00:18 | 18:10 +00:19 |
| Sled Pull | 05:10 | 24:03 | 05:34 -00:24 | 24:02 +00:01 |
| Running 4 | 05:53 | 29:13 | 05:52 +00:01 | 29:36 -00:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:31 | 35:06 | 06:19 +00:12 | 35:28 -00:22 |
| Running 5 | 06:16 | 41:37 | 06:07 +00:09 | 41:47 -00:10 |
| Rowing | 05:31 | 47:53 | 05:03 +00:28 | 47:54 -00:01 |
| Running 6 | 06:09 | 53:24 | 05:55 +00:14 | 52:57 +00:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:24 | 59:33 | 02:27 -00:03 | 58:52 +00:41 |
| Running 7 | 06:12 | 01:01:57 | 05:54 +00:18 | 01:01:19 +00:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:42 | 01:08:09 | 05:54 +00:48 | 01:07:13 +00:56 |
| Running 8 | 06:42 | 01:14:51 | 06:49 -00:07 | 01:13:07 +01:44 |
| Wall Balls | 04:55 | 01:21:33 | 07:40 -02:45 | 01:19:56 +01:37 |
| Roxzone | 09:21 | 01:35:43 | 08:07 +01:14 | 01:35:43 |
Pacing and Profile:
Martin's total running time of 00:47:05 was 01:37 slower than the average. This suggests that he may benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time in order to reduce the time spent in the roxzone. Additionally, his total running time being slower than average indicates that he may need to focus more on his running ability in training.
Overall, Martin Fitzgerald's performance in the Hyrox race in Birmingham was commendable. By focusing on improving his running performance, reducing time spent in the roxzone, and targeting specific segments for improvement, he can enhance his overall performance in future races. Incorporating the suggested exercises, drills, and training routines will help him build the necessary strength, endurance, and agility to excel in the Hyrox race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wassmann Martin | 2023 Hamburg | 01:35:34 | |
| Abelman Jerome | 2024 Malaga | 01:35:30 | |
| Hufnagel Ansgar | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:36:03 | |
| Jennison Matt | 2022 London | 01:36:05 | |
| Rocha García José Luis | 2024 Mexico City | 01:35:28 | |
| Nutter Cameron | 2023 Melbourne | 01:36:09 | |
| Theisen Marco | 2022 Essen | 01:35:29 | |
| O'Connor Ian | 2024 Dublin | 01:36:02 | |
| Gebhardt Falko | 2023 Hamburg | 01:35:47 | |
| Grönert Andreas | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:35:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
