Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Brown Conal's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Brown Conal's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Brown Conal's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Brown Conal's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:08 | 07:38 to 05:30 | 44.0% |
| Run Total | 01:15 | 40:41 to 39:26 | 25.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:39 | 04:54 to 04:15 | 13.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:35 | 02:29 to 01:54 | 12.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:14 | 04:44 to 04:30 | 4.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:56 to 03:56 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:18 to 02:18 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Brown Conal | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:22 | 00:00 | 04:23 -01:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:56 | 03:22 | 04:21 -00:25 | 04:23 -01:01 |
| Running 2 | 04:56 | 07:18 | 04:44 +00:12 | 08:44 -01:26 |
| Sled Push | 02:18 | 12:14 | 02:44 -00:26 | 13:28 -01:14 |
| Running 3 | 05:04 | 14:32 | 05:08 -00:04 | 16:12 -01:40 |
| Sled Pull | 04:54 | 19:36 | 04:36 +00:18 | 21:20 -01:44 |
| Running 4 | 05:05 | 24:30 | 05:06 -00:01 | 25:56 -01:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:44 | 29:35 | 04:54 -00:10 | 31:02 -01:27 |
| Running 5 | 05:15 | 34:19 | 05:15 +00:00 | 35:56 -01:37 |
| Rowing | 04:31 | 39:34 | 04:41 -00:10 | 41:11 -01:37 |
| Running 6 | 05:22 | 44:05 | 05:08 +00:14 | 45:52 -01:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:29 | 49:27 | 02:04 +00:25 | 51:00 -01:33 |
| Running 7 | 05:19 | 51:56 | 05:07 +00:12 | 53:04 -01:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:59 | 57:15 | 04:46 -00:47 | 58:11 -00:56 |
| Running 8 | 06:20 | 01:01:14 | 05:36 +00:44 | 01:02:57 -01:43 |
| Wall Balls | 07:38 | 01:07:34 | 05:59 +01:39 | 01:08:33 -00:59 |
| Roxzone | 05:39 | 01:20:44 | 06:12 -00:33 | 01:20:44 |
Conal Brown delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, finishing in the top 24% overall and top 27% in his age group. His total running time was 13 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong running capability. However, his pacing strategy could be refined, as he started the race very fast in Running 1 (5 Percentile Rank) but gradually slowed down, with Running 8 notably slower than average (86 Percentile Rank). This suggests a potential need to balance energy expenditure more evenly throughout the race. Overall, Conal exhibits a hybrid profile with a slight edge in running, but there's room for improvement in strength segments, particularly towards the end of the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schmitz Michael | 2019 Essen | 01:21:02 | |
| Mateja Radoslaw | 2024 Berlin | 01:20:46 | |
| Wells Joe | 2022 London | 01:20:27 | |
| Prayitno Fauzi Hestia | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:20:17 | |
| Sosa Ramiro | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:20:26 | |
| Barlow Luke | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:20 | |
| Lim Kun Yi | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:20:59 | |
| Van Roekel Hans | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:21:03 | |
| Augustyniak Bart | 2024 Sydney | 01:20:48 | |
| Mancassola Davide | 2024 Rimini | 01:20:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dublin | 01:12:04 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
