Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bethune Cale's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bethune Cale's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bethune Cale's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bethune Cale's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:17. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:16 | 50:47 to 46:31 | 67.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:21 | 07:31 to 06:10 | 21.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:38 | 08:02 to 07:24 | 10.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:02 | 05:47 to 05:45 | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Bethune Cale | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:08 | 00:00 | 05:00 +00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 05:08 | 04:38 -00:18 | 05:00 +00:08 |
| Running 2 | 05:16 | 09:28 | 05:26 -00:10 | 09:38 -00:10 |
| Sled Push | 01:50 | 14:44 | 03:16 -01:26 | 15:04 -00:20 |
| Running 3 | 06:01 | 16:34 | 05:59 +00:02 | 18:20 -01:46 |
| Sled Pull | 04:22 | 22:35 | 05:40 -01:18 | 24:19 -01:44 |
| Running 4 | 06:06 | 26:57 | 05:56 +00:10 | 29:59 -03:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:31 | 33:03 | 06:22 +01:09 | 35:55 -02:52 |
| Running 5 | 07:00 | 40:34 | 06:11 +00:49 | 42:17 -01:43 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 47:34 | 05:03 -00:13 | 48:28 -00:54 |
| Running 6 | 06:10 | 52:24 | 06:00 +00:10 | 53:31 -01:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 58:34 | 02:25 -00:12 | 59:31 -00:57 |
| Running 7 | 08:47 | 01:00:47 | 05:58 +02:49 | 01:01:56 -01:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:47 | 01:09:34 | 05:55 -00:08 | 01:07:54 +01:40 |
| Running 8 | 06:24 | 01:15:21 | 06:54 -00:30 | 01:13:49 +01:32 |
| Wall Balls | 08:02 | 01:21:45 | 07:43 +00:19 | 01:20:43 +01:02 |
| Roxzone | 07:03 | 01:36:42 | 08:16 -01:13 | 01:36:42 |
Cale Bethune delivered a solid performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, finishing in the top 46% overall and ranking in the top 43% within his age group. His overall time was 01:36:42. Cale demonstrated strong capabilities in strength-based exercises, particularly excelling in the Sled Push and Sled Pull. However, his total running time of 00:50:47 was notably slower than the average by 03:02, indicating a need for improved running efficiency. His pace suggests that he may have started at a reasonable speed but struggled to maintain consistency, particularly in the later stages of the race. Given his performance, Cale exhibits a hybrid profile, showcasing strength in certain physical exercises but requiring improvement in running efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bär Jan | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:36:15 | |
| Adair Luke | 2022 New York | 01:36:59 | |
| Wescott Cody | 2021 Chicago | 01:36:42 | |
| Comerford Daniel | 2023 Stockholm | 01:36:50 | |
| Neiberding Luke | 2024 Melbourne | 01:36:54 | |
| Grillenberger Stefan | 2019 Wien | 01:36:41 | |
| Jenkins Rhys | 2022 London | 01:36:38 | |
| Lafferty Carl | 2024 London | 01:37:00 | |
| Weinhold Ole | 2024 Köln | 01:37:07 | |
| Causev Eri | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:36:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
