Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bennett Conor's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bennett Conor's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bennett Conor's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bennett Conor's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:49 | 40:05 to 37:16 | 69.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:27 | 02:12 to 01:45 | 11.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:26 | 04:30 to 04:04 | 10.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:11 | 05:11 to 05:00 | 4.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:09 | 02:24 to 02:15 | 3.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:02 | 04:03 to 04:01 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:11 to 04:10 | 0.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:26 to 03:26 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Bennett Conor | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:49 | 00:00 | 04:14 +01:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 05:49 | 04:18 -00:07 | 04:14 +01:35 |
| Running 2 | 04:52 | 10:00 | 04:33 +00:19 | 08:32 +01:28 |
| Sled Push | 02:24 | 14:52 | 02:37 -00:13 | 13:05 +01:47 |
| Running 3 | 04:47 | 17:16 | 04:54 -00:07 | 15:42 +01:34 |
| Sled Pull | 03:26 | 22:03 | 04:21 -00:55 | 20:36 +01:27 |
| Running 4 | 04:48 | 25:29 | 04:52 -00:04 | 24:57 +00:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:03 | 30:17 | 04:32 -00:29 | 29:49 +00:28 |
| Running 5 | 04:54 | 34:20 | 04:59 -00:05 | 34:21 -00:01 |
| Rowing | 04:22 | 39:14 | 04:36 -00:14 | 39:20 -00:06 |
| Running 6 | 04:49 | 43:36 | 04:53 -00:04 | 43:56 -00:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 48:25 | 01:58 +00:14 | 48:49 -00:24 |
| Running 7 | 04:44 | 50:37 | 04:52 -00:08 | 50:47 -00:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:30 | 55:21 | 04:27 +00:03 | 55:39 -00:18 |
| Running 8 | 05:27 | 59:51 | 05:17 +00:10 | 01:00:06 -00:15 |
| Wall Balls | 05:11 | 01:05:18 | 05:38 -00:27 | 01:05:23 -00:05 |
| Roxzone | 06:23 | 01:16:43 | 05:42 +00:41 | 01:16:43 |
Conor Bennett showcased an impressive performance at the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event, finishing in the top 16% of 4107 athletes overall and ranking in the top 20% of his age group (25-29). His overall time was 01:16:43, with his total running time being 00:40:05, which was 01:15 slower than the average. This implies that Conor has more of a strength-based profile and should focus on improving his running efficiency. Conor's pacing during the event seems to be slightly inconsistent with slower starts in the initial running segments and faster finishes in the later ones, suggesting that he may need to work on his pacing strategy.
For future races, Conor could benefit from implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bertoli Marco | 2024 Milan | 01:17:12 | |
| Jimenez Rodriguez Oscar | 2024 Madrid | 01:16:16 | |
| Supple Mark | 2024 Sydney | 01:16:48 | |
| Bläsche Richard | 2022 Berlin | 01:16:13 | |
| Muñoz Vides Aitor | 2021 Madrid | 01:16:57 | |
| Couzinet Marlon | 2020 Hannover | 01:16:24 | |
| Carswell Thomas | 2024 Birmingham | 01:17:11 | |
| Kang Changmook | 2024 Incheon | 01:16:57 | |
| Garcia Ramiro | 2024 Madrid | 01:16:51 | |
| Van Der Linden Sander | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:17:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
