Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bell Luke's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bell Luke's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bell Luke's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bell Luke's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:33 | 42:48 to 39:15 | 68.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:52 | 05:19 to 04:27 | 16.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:35 | 03:02 to 02:27 | 11.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 02:03 to 01:53 | 3.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Bell Luke | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:20 | 00:00 | 04:23 -00:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:08 | 04:20 | 04:21 -00:13 | 04:23 -00:03 |
| Running 2 | 04:57 | 08:28 | 04:43 +00:14 | 08:44 -00:16 |
| Sled Push | 03:02 | 13:25 | 02:44 +00:18 | 13:27 -00:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:12 | 16:27 | 05:07 +00:05 | 16:11 +00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 04:01 | 21:39 | 04:34 -00:33 | 21:18 +00:21 |
| Running 4 | 05:21 | 25:40 | 05:06 +00:15 | 25:52 -00:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:19 | 31:01 | 04:53 +00:26 | 30:58 +00:03 |
| Running 5 | 05:40 | 36:20 | 05:14 +00:26 | 35:51 +00:29 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 42:00 | 04:40 -00:06 | 41:05 +00:55 |
| Running 6 | 05:36 | 46:34 | 05:07 +00:29 | 45:45 +00:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 52:10 | 02:03 +00:00 | 50:52 +01:18 |
| Running 7 | 05:33 | 54:13 | 05:06 +00:27 | 52:55 +01:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:21 | 59:46 | 04:43 -00:22 | 58:01 +01:45 |
| Running 8 | 06:09 | 01:04:07 | 05:34 +00:35 | 01:02:44 +01:23 |
| Wall Balls | 05:00 | 01:10:16 | 05:57 -00:57 | 01:08:18 +01:58 |
| Roxzone | 05:07 | 01:20:23 | 06:08 -01:01 | 01:20:23 |
Luke Bell's participation in the 2024 Manchester HYROX race showcases a commendable effort, placing him within the top 24% of all athletes and top 30% in his age group. His overall time was 01:20:23, illustrating a competitive spirit and a strong baseline fitness level. Notably, his total running time was 03:40 slower than the average, indicating a potential area for improvement. Despite this, Luke displayed exceptional strength in specific exercise zones, notably the Sled Pull, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls, where he performed significantly faster than average. This suggests that Luke has a hybrid profile with a lean towards strength exercises but could benefit from a more balanced approach to enhance his running performance. The Roxzone time being faster than average indicates good overall fitness and transition efficiency, yet there is room for improvement in race pacing and running endurance.
By focusing on these targeted areas for improvement and implementing the suggested training strategies and race-day tactics, Luke Bell can expect to see significant improvements in his future HYROX race performances, potentially moving up in both his age group and overall rankings.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hovi Saul | 2024 Stockholm | 01:19:56 | |
| Davies Shane | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:49 | |
| Perez Victor | 2023 Dublin | 01:20:03 | |
| Coy Edward | 2024 London | 01:19:58 | |
| Buchowicz Dariusz | 2024 Glasgow | 01:20:34 | |
| Eder Gerhard | 2018 Wien | 01:19:59 | |
| Johnson Ryan | 2022 Chicago | 01:20:27 | |
| Torreno Nacho | 2023 Chicago | 01:20:25 | |
| Mangin Robert | 2019 Hamburg | 01:20:48 | |
| Croft Jack | 2023 London | 01:20:48 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Manchester | 01:34:12 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
