Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire van Tongerlo Djarno's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights van Tongerlo Djarno's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the van Tongerlo Djarno's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve van Tongerlo Djarno's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:16. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:44 | 07:07 to 05:23 | 53.1% |
| Rowing | 00:56 | 05:55 to 04:59 | 28.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:31 | 06:31 to 06:00 | 15.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:05 | 07:17 to 07:12 | 2.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:56 to 02:56 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:12 to 02:12 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 45:37 to 45:37 | 0.0% |
| van Tongerlo Djarno | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:06 | 00:00 | 04:57 -00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 04:06 | 04:35 -00:10 | 04:57 -00:51 |
| Running 2 | 04:38 | 08:31 | 05:23 -00:45 | 09:32 -01:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:56 | 13:09 | 03:12 -00:16 | 14:55 -01:46 |
| Running 3 | 03:55 | 16:05 | 05:51 -01:56 | 18:07 -02:02 |
| Sled Pull | 07:07 | 20:00 | 05:32 +01:35 | 23:58 -03:58 |
| Running 4 | 03:15 | 27:07 | 05:52 -02:37 | 29:30 -02:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:31 | 30:22 | 06:15 +00:16 | 35:22 -05:00 |
| Running 5 | 05:37 | 36:53 | 06:06 -00:29 | 41:37 -04:44 |
| Rowing | 05:55 | 42:30 | 05:03 +00:52 | 47:43 -05:13 |
| Running 6 | 05:34 | 48:25 | 05:54 -00:20 | 52:46 -04:21 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 53:59 | 02:25 -00:13 | 58:40 -04:41 |
| Running 7 | 02:56 | 56:11 | 05:53 -02:57 | 01:01:05 -04:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:16 | 59:07 | 05:51 -01:35 | 01:06:58 -07:51 |
| Running 8 | 06:39 | 01:03:23 | 06:50 -00:11 | 01:12:49 -09:26 |
| Wall Balls | 07:17 | 01:10:02 | 07:32 -00:15 | 01:19:39 -09:37 |
| Roxzone | 18:10 | 01:35:20 | 08:09 +10:01 | 01:35:20 |
His total running time of 00:45:37 was 00:26 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that Djarno's running performance could be improved. However, his best running lap time of 00:11:56 was strong, indicating that he has the capability to perform well in running segments.
Overall, Djarno van Tongerlo showed strong performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas for improvement, particularly in his roxzone time and running performance. By implementing the suggested training strategies and race strategies, Djarno can work towards enhancing his performance and achieving better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Manoijlovic Igor | 2018 Essen | 01:34:57 | |
| Forrester Paul | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:35:21 | |
| Nobbe Michael | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:34:53 | |
| Dees François | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:35:27 | |
| Bastian Matthieu | 2024 Singapore | 01:35:04 | |
| Niederlaender Dirk | 2022 Essen | 01:34:56 | |
| Tan Johnny | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:35:18 | |
| Rigby Nicholas | 2023 Malmö | 01:35:15 | |
| Hall Brian | 2024 Dallas | 01:35:47 | |
| Noci Matteo | 2023 Rimini | 01:34:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Essen | 01:19:11 | |
| 2022 Maastricht | 01:19:13 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:10:18 | |
| 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:17:34 | |
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:19:46 | |
| 2023 Köln | 01:30:18 | |
| 2022 Amsterdam | 01:31:03 | |
| 2024 Köln | 01:21:59 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
