Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Rijn Rick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Rijn Rick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Rijn Rick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Rijn Rick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:26 | 49:31 to 46:05 | 61.5% |
| Wall Balls | 01:40 | 08:56 to 07:16 | 29.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:22 | 02:44 to 02:22 | 6.6% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 05:03 to 04:59 | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:38 to 04:35 | 0.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:51 to 02:51 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:37 to 05:37 | 0.0% |
| Van Rijn Rick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:47 | 00:00 | 04:59 -01:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 03:47 | 04:36 +00:02 | 04:59 -01:12 |
| Running 2 | 05:49 | 08:25 | 05:24 +00:25 | 09:35 -01:10 |
| Sled Push | 02:51 | 14:14 | 03:14 -00:23 | 14:59 -00:45 |
| Running 3 | 06:20 | 17:05 | 05:55 +00:25 | 18:13 -01:08 |
| Sled Pull | 04:38 | 23:25 | 05:38 -01:00 | 24:08 -00:43 |
| Running 4 | 06:18 | 28:03 | 05:54 +00:24 | 29:46 -01:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:35 | 34:21 | 06:20 -00:45 | 35:40 -01:19 |
| Running 5 | 06:49 | 39:56 | 06:08 +00:41 | 42:00 -02:04 |
| Rowing | 05:03 | 46:45 | 05:03 +00:00 | 48:08 -01:23 |
| Running 6 | 06:05 | 51:48 | 05:57 +00:08 | 53:11 -01:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:44 | 57:53 | 02:26 +00:18 | 59:08 -01:15 |
| Running 7 | 06:39 | 01:00:37 | 05:56 +00:43 | 01:01:34 -00:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:37 | 01:07:16 | 05:54 -00:17 | 01:07:30 -00:14 |
| Running 8 | 07:46 | 01:12:53 | 06:48 +00:58 | 01:13:24 -00:31 |
| Wall Balls | 08:56 | 01:20:39 | 07:40 +01:16 | 01:20:12 +00:27 |
| Roxzone | 06:36 | 01:36:05 | 08:13 -01:37 | 01:36:05 |
Rick Van Rijn's performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race places him in the top 52% of all athletes and the top 55% within his age group. His overall time was 01:36:05, with a total running time of 00:49:31, which was 02:05 slower than the average. Although his running started strong, as seen in the first segment where he was 01:05 faster than average, his pace dropped significantly in subsequent segments. This suggests an initial fast start followed by a decrease in pace, indicating potential pacing strategy improvements. The Roxzone time was notably faster than average, reflecting efficient transitions. However, since his total running time is slower than average, it indicates a need for improvement in running endurance and speed. Rick demonstrates a hybrid profile but leans more towards strength, as evidenced by his strong performance in strength-based exercises like the Sled Push and Sled Pull.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Vaessen Robert | 2024 Maastricht | 01:35:57 | |
| Henkel Marcel | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:36:08 | |
| Dion Stéphane | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:35:39 | |
| Van Den Berg Maarten | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:35:44 | |
| Fischer Ludwig | 2022 Leipzig | 01:36:32 | |
| Kucharski Michał | 2024 Poznan | 01:36:18 | |
| Krohn Johannes | 2023 Hamburg | 01:35:55 | |
| Holland Stephen | 2024 Birmingham | 01:36:20 | |
| Bell Josh | 2023 Singapore | 01:36:05 | |
| Gillespie Robbie | 2024 Milan | 01:36:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
