Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Treacy David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Treacy David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Treacy David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Treacy David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:00 | 44:51 to 42:51 | 49.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:05 | 07:27 to 06:22 | 26.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:32 | 02:39 to 02:07 | 13.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:15 | 03:05 to 02:50 | 6.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:11 | 05:14 to 05:03 | 4.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:27 to 04:26 | 0.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:53 to 03:53 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Treacy David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:48 | 00:00 | 04:42 +01:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 05:48 | 04:29 -00:02 | 04:42 +01:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:02 | 10:15 | 05:05 -00:03 | 09:11 +01:04 |
| Sled Push | 03:05 | 15:17 | 02:59 +00:06 | 14:16 +01:01 |
| Running 3 | 05:21 | 18:22 | 05:33 -00:12 | 17:15 +01:07 |
| Sled Pull | 04:44 | 23:43 | 05:05 -00:21 | 22:48 +00:55 |
| Running 4 | 05:38 | 28:27 | 05:32 +00:06 | 27:53 +00:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:53 | 34:05 | 05:34 -01:41 | 33:25 +00:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 37:58 | 05:42 -00:01 | 38:59 -01:01 |
| Rowing | 04:32 | 43:39 | 04:52 -00:20 | 44:41 -01:02 |
| Running 6 | 05:37 | 48:11 | 05:34 +00:03 | 49:33 -01:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:39 | 53:48 | 02:15 +00:24 | 55:07 -01:19 |
| Running 7 | 05:27 | 56:27 | 05:33 -00:06 | 57:22 -00:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:14 | 01:01:54 | 05:20 -00:06 | 01:02:55 -01:01 |
| Running 8 | 06:20 | 01:07:08 | 06:13 +00:07 | 01:08:15 -01:07 |
| Wall Balls | 07:27 | 01:13:28 | 06:47 +00:40 | 01:14:28 -01:00 |
| Roxzone | 07:31 | 01:28:20 | 07:05 +00:26 | 01:28:20 |
David Treacy showed a commendable performance at the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race. Finishing in the top 38% of 4107 athletes and in the top 35% of his age group, he exhibited a balanced profile showing aptitude in both running and strength segments. Unfortunately, his total running time was slightly slower than average, hinting that his running pace might require some attention.
His strongest performances were evident in the Burpees Broad Jump and Rowing segments where he was significantly faster than the average. These strengths indicate a solid level of cardiovascular fitness and power.
In terms of pacing, David started the race slower than average in Running 1, which might have impacted his overall performance and left him playing catch-up throughout the race. This slower start could indicate a need for better race-start strategies or improved initial speed and stamina.
David should consider implementing the following strategies for better performance in future races:
With these strategies in place, David Treacy is likely to see improvements in his overall race times and rankings in future events.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bellows Andrew | 2023 Singapore | 01:28:30 | |
| Suurs Dave | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:28:07 | |
| DAnna Liborio | 2024 Rimini | 01:28:35 | |
| Pummerer Christian | 2023 München | 01:28:00 | |
| Vidal Tabernero Vctor | 2023 Madrid | 01:28:15 | |
| Langnäse Gunnar | 2024 Köln | 01:28:43 | |
| Hornsey Johnathan | 2024 Sydney | 01:28:11 | |
| Tulwar Anup | 2023 London | 01:28:13 | |
| Laninge Niklas | 2024 Stockholm | 01:28:27 | |
| Mönnig Laurenz | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:27:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dublin | 01:18:00 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
