Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Leipzig using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tanski Steve's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tanski Steve's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tanski Steve's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tanski Steve's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:21 | 05:57 to 04:36 | 32.5% |
| Run Total | 00:52 | 42:21 to 41:29 | 20.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:37 | 03:18 to 02:41 | 14.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:32 | 02:34 to 02:02 | 12.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:24 | 05:22 to 04:58 | 9.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:18 | 05:06 to 04:48 | 7.2% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:46 to 04:43 | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:24 to 04:22 | 0.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:58 to 05:58 | 0.0% |
| Tanski Steve | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:15 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 04:15 | 04:26 -00:02 | 04:35 -00:20 |
| Running 2 | 04:59 | 08:39 | 04:55 +00:04 | 09:01 -00:22 |
| Sled Push | 03:18 | 13:38 | 02:51 +00:27 | 13:56 -00:18 |
| Running 3 | 05:27 | 16:56 | 05:22 +00:05 | 16:47 +00:09 |
| Sled Pull | 05:57 | 22:23 | 04:53 +01:04 | 22:09 +00:14 |
| Running 4 | 05:26 | 28:20 | 05:20 +00:06 | 27:02 +01:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:22 | 33:46 | 05:17 +00:05 | 32:22 +01:24 |
| Running 5 | 05:38 | 39:08 | 05:31 +00:07 | 37:39 +01:29 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 44:46 | 04:48 -00:02 | 43:10 +01:36 |
| Running 6 | 05:20 | 49:32 | 05:22 -00:02 | 47:58 +01:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:34 | 54:52 | 02:10 +00:24 | 53:20 +01:32 |
| Running 7 | 05:26 | 57:26 | 05:21 +00:05 | 55:30 +01:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:06 | 01:02:52 | 05:03 +00:03 | 01:00:51 +02:01 |
| Running 8 | 05:55 | 01:07:58 | 05:57 -00:02 | 01:05:54 +02:04 |
| Wall Balls | 05:58 | 01:13:53 | 06:27 -00:29 | 01:11:51 +02:02 |
| Roxzone | 05:20 | 01:25:03 | 06:45 -01:25 | 01:25:03 |
Pacing and Profile:
Based on the splits analysis, Steve's overall running time of 00:42:21 was 00:56 slower than the average. This indicates that he may benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time in order to reduce the time spent in the roxzone. To enhance this segment, Steve should focus on improving his overall fitness level and working on quicker transitions between exercises.
In conclusion, Steve Tanski showed a solid performance in the HYROX race in Leipzig. To improve his race performance, he should focus on improving his overall fitness level, reducing time spent in the roxzone, and working on specific areas of weakness identified in the splits analysis. By incorporating the suggested training strategies and techniques, Steve can enhance his performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mastrangelo Gabriel | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:24:34 | |
| Denz Erik | 2024 Hamburg | 01:25:01 | |
| Wagenführ Marten | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:25:14 | |
| Clery Joshua | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:25:16 | |
| Verwer Mel | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:25:07 | |
| Newman Tim | 2024 Dublin | 01:24:41 | |
| Geil Marcel | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:25:19 | |
| Bohne Robin | 2022 Bremen | 01:25:09 | |
| Newman Richard | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:17 | |
| Dyer Billy | 2023 London | 01:24:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Leipzig | 01:24:33 | |
| 2022 Frankfurt | 01:18:01 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
