Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ramirez Garrido Juan José's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ramirez Garrido Juan José's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ramirez Garrido Juan José's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ramirez Garrido Juan José's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:15 | 08:00 to 06:45 | 28.6% |
| Sled Push | 01:00 | 03:59 to 02:59 | 22.9% |
| Run Total | 00:39 | 44:56 to 44:17 | 14.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:27 | 02:40 to 02:13 | 10.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:22 | 04:52 to 04:30 | 8.4% |
| Rowing | 00:21 | 05:14 to 04:53 | 8.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:17 | 05:54 to 05:37 | 6.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:01 | 05:20 to 05:19 | 0.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Ramirez Garrido Juan José | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:34 | 00:00 | 04:47 -00:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 04:34 | 04:33 +00:19 | 04:47 -00:13 |
| Running 2 | 05:05 | 09:26 | 05:17 -00:12 | 09:20 +00:06 |
| Sled Push | 03:59 | 14:31 | 03:08 +00:51 | 14:37 -00:06 |
| Running 3 | 05:42 | 18:30 | 05:45 -00:03 | 17:45 +00:45 |
| Sled Pull | 04:37 | 24:12 | 05:23 -00:46 | 23:30 +00:42 |
| Running 4 | 05:38 | 28:49 | 05:44 -00:06 | 28:53 -00:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:54 | 34:27 | 05:56 -00:02 | 34:37 -00:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:55 | 40:21 | 05:56 -00:01 | 40:33 -00:12 |
| Rowing | 05:14 | 46:16 | 04:58 +00:16 | 46:29 -00:13 |
| Running 6 | 05:42 | 51:30 | 05:47 -00:05 | 51:27 +00:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:40 | 57:12 | 02:21 +00:19 | 57:14 -00:02 |
| Running 7 | 05:24 | 59:52 | 05:44 -00:20 | 59:35 +00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:20 | 01:05:16 | 05:33 -00:13 | 01:05:19 -00:03 |
| Running 8 | 07:00 | 01:10:36 | 06:31 +00:29 | 01:10:52 -00:16 |
| Wall Balls | 08:00 | 01:17:36 | 07:11 +00:49 | 01:17:23 +00:13 |
| Roxzone | 06:44 | 01:32:11 | 07:37 -00:53 | 01:32:11 |
In terms of his running performance, Juan performed well with a total running time of 00:44:56, which was 44 seconds slower than the average. His best running lap was 00:04:34, which was 4 seconds faster than the average. This suggests that he has a solid running profile and should continue to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the suggested training techniques and exercises, Juan can improve his performance in the identified areas and enhance his overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Coyle Danny | 2023 London | 01:31:58 | |
| Mavroudis Dimitri | 2024 Paris | 01:32:01 | |
| Mohacsi Tom | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:32:34 | |
| Lawton Daniel | 2024 Glasgow | 01:31:47 | |
| Bolms Jens | 2023 München | 01:32:05 | |
| Robinson Ben | 2024 London | 01:32:32 | |
| Boom Michael | 2018 Hamburg | 01:31:47 | |
| Gomez Victor | 2024 Madrid | 01:32:38 | |
| Scamardella Antonio | 2023 London | 01:32:38 | |
| Drozdowski Adam | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:31:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
