Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcloughlin Conor's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcloughlin Conor's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcloughlin Conor's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcloughlin Conor's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:21 | 10:30 to 07:09 | 58.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:55 | 06:52 to 05:57 | 15.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:38 | 03:46 to 03:08 | 11.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:34 | 05:55 to 05:21 | 9.8% |
| Rowing | 00:18 | 05:16 to 04:58 | 5.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 45:37 to 45:37 | 0.0% |
| Mcloughlin Conor | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:02 | 00:00 | 04:58 -00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 04:02 | 04:35 -00:01 | 04:58 -00:56 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 08:36 | 05:23 -00:05 | 09:33 -00:57 |
| Sled Push | 03:46 | 13:54 | 03:11 +00:35 | 14:56 -01:02 |
| Running 3 | 06:16 | 17:40 | 05:52 +00:24 | 18:07 -00:27 |
| Sled Pull | 05:55 | 23:56 | 05:30 +00:25 | 23:59 -00:03 |
| Running 4 | 06:23 | 29:51 | 05:52 +00:31 | 29:29 +00:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:52 | 36:14 | 06:13 +00:39 | 35:21 +00:53 |
| Running 5 | 06:24 | 43:06 | 06:05 +00:19 | 41:34 +01:32 |
| Rowing | 05:16 | 49:30 | 05:02 +00:14 | 47:39 +01:51 |
| Running 6 | 06:01 | 54:46 | 05:54 +00:07 | 52:41 +02:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:16 | 01:00:47 | 02:25 -00:09 | 58:35 +02:12 |
| Running 7 | 06:32 | 01:03:03 | 05:52 +00:40 | 01:01:00 +02:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:22 | 01:09:35 | 05:50 -01:28 | 01:06:52 +02:43 |
| Running 8 | 04:45 | 01:13:57 | 06:48 -02:03 | 01:12:42 +01:15 |
| Wall Balls | 10:30 | 01:18:42 | 07:31 +02:59 | 01:19:30 -00:48 |
| Roxzone | 06:03 | 01:35:06 | 08:05 -02:02 | 01:35:06 |
Conor Mcloughlin delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Dublin Hyrox race. Despite being in the challenging age group of 30-34, Conor managed to finish within the top 50% of athletes overall and within the top 57% in his age group. This is a testimony to his overall fitness and endurance.
His total running time highlights his proficiency as a runner. He was able to complete the total running segment 01:20 faster than the average, indicating a strong cardiovascular fitness level. His pacing was notably strong in the initial stages of the race, as seen in the 'Running 1' segment where he was 00:53 faster than the average. This suggests that he began the race at a high pace.
However, his performance in the strength segments was not as strong, indicating a runner profile. His roxzone time was also significantly faster than average, suggesting he is efficient in transitions and recovers well between exercises.
Based on his performance, Conor should consider the following strategies for future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Siero Remco | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:34:54 | |
| Wilkes Nick | 2023 Dublin | 01:35:13 | |
| Perrin Steve | 2023 London | 01:34:54 | |
| Castellari Luca | 2024 Milan | 01:35:19 | |
| Luchmun Kevin | 2023 London | 01:34:45 | |
| Smith Kevin | 2022 Hamburg | 01:35:30 | |
| Broda Federico | 2023 Milan | 01:35:23 | |
| Zamora Cordero Eduardo | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:34:49 | |
| Passoni Daniele | 2023 Rimini | 01:34:39 | |
| Walker Matthew | 2023 Birmingham | 01:35:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
