Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire La Porta Elia's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights La Porta Elia's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the La Porta Elia's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve La Porta Elia's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:55 | 08:14 to 05:19 | 38.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:51 | 07:28 to 05:37 | 24.2% |
| Sled Push | 01:25 | 04:24 to 02:59 | 18.5% |
| Sled Pull | 01:11 | 06:17 to 05:06 | 15.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:26 to 02:13 | 2.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:34 to 04:30 | 0.9% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:54 to 40:54 | 0.0% |
| La Porta Elia | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:30 | 00:00 | 04:47 +01:43 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 06:30 | 04:33 +00:01 | 04:47 +01:43 |
| Running 2 | 05:01 | 11:04 | 05:16 -00:15 | 09:20 +01:44 |
| Sled Push | 04:24 | 16:05 | 03:08 +01:16 | 14:36 +01:29 |
| Running 3 | 05:10 | 20:29 | 05:45 -00:35 | 17:44 +02:45 |
| Sled Pull | 06:17 | 25:39 | 05:22 +00:55 | 23:29 +02:10 |
| Running 4 | 05:10 | 31:56 | 05:44 -00:34 | 28:51 +03:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:28 | 37:06 | 05:56 +01:32 | 34:35 +02:31 |
| Running 5 | 05:14 | 44:34 | 05:56 -00:42 | 40:31 +04:03 |
| Rowing | 04:31 | 49:48 | 04:58 -00:27 | 46:27 +03:21 |
| Running 6 | 04:57 | 54:19 | 05:46 -00:49 | 51:25 +02:54 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:26 | 59:16 | 02:21 +00:05 | 57:11 +02:05 |
| Running 7 | 04:55 | 01:01:42 | 05:44 -00:49 | 59:32 +02:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:14 | 01:06:37 | 05:32 +02:42 | 01:05:16 +01:21 |
| Running 8 | 04:01 | 01:14:51 | 06:31 -02:30 | 01:10:48 +04:03 |
| Wall Balls | 04:47 | 01:18:52 | 07:11 -02:24 | 01:17:19 +01:33 |
| Roxzone | 08:38 | 01:32:08 | 07:38 +01:00 | 01:32:08 |
Elia La Porta demonstrated a strong overall performance in the 2024 Milan Hyrox race, finishing in the top 54% overall and top 60% in his age group. His total running time was notably faster than average by 05:02, indicating a strong running profile. However, the initial running segment was slower compared to the average, suggesting a conservative start. Elia's standout strength lies in his running capabilities, which were consistently faster than average from Running 2 onward. His performance in the strength and endurance-based exercises like the Sandbag Lunges and Sled Push/Pull needs improvement, indicating a need for more focused strength training to balance his running prowess.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cachin Mathieu | 2023 München | 01:31:54 | |
| Futcher Charlie | 2024 Manchester | 01:32:33 | |
| Power Murphy Shane | 2023 Glasgow | 01:32:22 | |
| Smart Calum | 2023 Glasgow | 01:31:55 | |
| Borges Pedro | 2024 Singapore | 01:32:31 | |
| Żytkowiak Michał | 2024 Katowice | 01:32:11 | |
| Tomlinson Adam | 2024 Manchester | 01:31:54 | |
| Beaney Jacob | 2023 London | 01:32:17 | |
| Altenhofer Jannik | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:32:09 | |
| Chew Nicholas | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:32:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Turin | 01:55:59 | |
| 2024 Rimini | 01:39:12 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
