Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire La Neve Pat's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights La Neve Pat's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the La Neve Pat's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve La Neve Pat's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:24 | 41:26 to 37:02 | 62.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:39 | 02:53 to 02:14 | 9.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:37 | 04:29 to 03:52 | 8.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:31 | 04:33 to 04:02 | 7.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:29 | 05:27 to 04:58 | 6.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:22 | 02:06 to 01:44 | 5.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:45 to 03:45 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| La Neve Pat | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:51 | 00:00 | 04:14 +00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:06 | 04:51 | 04:17 -00:11 | 04:14 +00:37 |
| Running 2 | 04:56 | 08:57 | 04:31 +00:25 | 08:31 +00:26 |
| Sled Push | 02:53 | 13:53 | 02:36 +00:17 | 13:02 +00:51 |
| Running 3 | 05:24 | 16:46 | 04:53 +00:31 | 15:38 +01:08 |
| Sled Pull | 04:29 | 22:10 | 04:20 +00:09 | 20:31 +01:39 |
| Running 4 | 05:15 | 26:39 | 04:51 +00:24 | 24:51 +01:48 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:45 | 31:54 | 04:29 -00:44 | 29:42 +02:12 |
| Running 5 | 05:26 | 35:39 | 04:58 +00:28 | 34:11 +01:28 |
| Rowing | 04:28 | 41:05 | 04:35 -00:07 | 39:09 +01:56 |
| Running 6 | 05:06 | 45:33 | 04:52 +00:14 | 43:44 +01:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 50:39 | 01:57 +00:09 | 48:36 +02:03 |
| Running 7 | 05:11 | 52:45 | 04:50 +00:21 | 50:33 +02:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:33 | 57:56 | 04:26 +00:07 | 55:23 +02:33 |
| Running 8 | 05:20 | 01:02:29 | 05:14 +00:06 | 59:49 +02:40 |
| Wall Balls | 05:27 | 01:07:49 | 05:34 -00:07 | 01:05:03 +02:46 |
| Roxzone | 03:09 | 01:16:17 | 05:40 -02:31 | 01:16:17 |
Pacing:
Pat's overall pacing was consistent, with no significant fluctuations in his splits. This indicates good race management and the ability to maintain a steady effort throughout the race. However, it is worth noting that his total running time was 03:55 slower than the average, suggesting that he may benefit from improving his running speed and efficiency.
Profile:
Based on the total running time, it appears that Pat has more of a strength profile rather than a runner profile. This is indicated by his slower running time compared to the average, suggesting that he may need to focus more on improving his running endurance and speed.
In summary, Pat La Neve had a strong performance in the 2023 New York Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can make improvements. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques tailored to his weakest segments, he can enhance his performance in future races. Incorporating interval training, hill sprints, strength exercises, and efficient transitions will help him improve his running speed, endurance, and overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecksten Beau | 2024 Sydney | 01:15:54 | |
| Smith Thomas | 2024 Sydney | 01:15:51 | |
| Greco Luke | 2024 Melbourne | 01:16:42 | |
| Pace Alberto | 2024 Milan | 01:16:08 | |
| Lucas Gavin | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:15:58 | |
| Mcmanus Paul | 2023 Warschau | 01:16:43 | |
| Masbruch Steffen | 2022 Leipzig | 01:16:28 | |
| Holliday Ryne | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:16:01 | |
| Szabo Aron | 2024 Köln | 01:16:37 | |
| Christensen Casper | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:16:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 New York | 01:20:25 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
