Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kremb Markus's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kremb Markus's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kremb Markus's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kremb Markus's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:26 | 49:42 to 48:16 | 35.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:56 | 03:28 to 02:32 | 22.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:37 | 06:27 to 05:50 | 15.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:32 | 03:57 to 03:25 | 13.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:18 | 06:52 to 06:34 | 7.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:53 to 04:41 | 4.9% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 05:11 to 05:07 | 1.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:58 to 05:58 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:45 to 06:45 | 0.0% |
| Kremb Markus | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:06 | 00:00 | 05:08 -00:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:53 | 05:06 | 04:40 +00:13 | 05:08 -00:02 |
| Running 2 | 05:39 | 09:59 | 05:41 -00:02 | 09:48 +00:11 |
| Sled Push | 03:57 | 15:38 | 03:29 +00:28 | 15:29 +00:09 |
| Running 3 | 06:30 | 19:35 | 06:13 +00:17 | 18:58 +00:37 |
| Sled Pull | 06:27 | 26:05 | 05:58 +00:29 | 25:11 +00:54 |
| Running 4 | 06:02 | 32:32 | 06:14 -00:12 | 31:09 +01:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:52 | 38:34 | 06:42 +00:10 | 37:23 +01:11 |
| Running 5 | 06:20 | 45:26 | 06:28 -00:08 | 44:05 +01:21 |
| Rowing | 05:11 | 51:46 | 05:10 +00:01 | 50:33 +01:13 |
| Running 6 | 06:12 | 56:57 | 06:16 -00:04 | 55:43 +01:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:28 | 01:03:09 | 02:33 +00:55 | 01:01:59 +01:10 |
| Running 7 | 06:29 | 01:06:37 | 06:17 +00:12 | 01:04:32 +02:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:58 | 01:13:06 | 06:15 -00:17 | 01:10:49 +02:17 |
| Running 8 | 07:29 | 01:19:04 | 07:24 +00:05 | 01:17:04 +02:00 |
| Wall Balls | 06:45 | 01:26:33 | 08:11 -01:26 | 01:24:28 +02:05 |
| Roxzone | 08:20 | 01:41:27 | 08:48 -00:28 | 01:41:27 |
In terms of pacing, Markus maintained a consistent speed throughout the race, with some segments being slightly slower than the average. His total running time of 00:49:42 was 02:28 slower than the average, indicating that he could improve his running performance. However, his best running lap of 00:05:06 was only 00:06 slower than the average, suggesting that he has the potential to excel in running.
By following these training strategies and techniques, Markus Kremb can enhance his overall performance in future HYROX races. It is important to tailor the training routines to his specific needs, taking into consideration his age group, nationality, and strengths/weaknesses identified through the race analysis.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Ryan | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:41:16 | |
| Love Daniel | 2023 London | 01:41:15 | |
| Giorgi Jeno | 2023 Chicago | 01:41:19 | |
| Hufnagel Ansgar | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:41:54 | |
| Di Marzio Emiliano Leon | 2024 Turin | 01:40:57 | |
| King John | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:41:36 | |
| Jonsson Forsblad Nils | 2023 Stockholm | 01:41:08 | |
| Trocino Michael | 2023 Dallas | 01:41:39 | |
| Prince Jordan | 2023 London | 01:41:20 | |
| Gołacki Piotr | 2023 Warschau | 01:41:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:33:45 | |
| 2023 Stuttgart | 01:34:06 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
