Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Flanagan Graeme's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Flanagan Graeme's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Flanagan Graeme's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Flanagan Graeme's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:06 | 09:30 to 07:24 | 37.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:59 | 07:09 to 06:10 | 17.3% |
| Rowing | 00:46 | 05:47 to 05:01 | 13.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:46 | 06:31 to 05:45 | 13.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:33 | 02:57 to 02:24 | 9.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:24 | 05:55 to 05:31 | 7.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:07 | 03:21 to 03:14 | 2.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:09 to 44:09 | 0.0% |
| Flanagan Graeme | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:06 | 00:00 | 04:59 -01:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 03:06 | 04:38 -00:17 | 04:59 -01:53 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 07:27 | 05:26 -00:36 | 09:37 -02:10 |
| Sled Push | 03:21 | 12:17 | 03:18 +00:03 | 15:03 -02:46 |
| Running 3 | 05:46 | 15:38 | 05:59 -00:13 | 18:21 -02:43 |
| Sled Pull | 05:55 | 21:24 | 05:40 +00:15 | 24:20 -02:56 |
| Running 4 | 06:09 | 27:19 | 05:57 +00:12 | 30:00 -02:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:09 | 33:28 | 06:24 +00:45 | 35:57 -02:29 |
| Running 5 | 06:27 | 40:37 | 06:12 +00:15 | 42:21 -01:44 |
| Rowing | 05:47 | 47:04 | 05:04 +00:43 | 48:33 -01:29 |
| Running 6 | 06:29 | 52:51 | 06:01 +00:28 | 53:37 -00:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:57 | 59:20 | 02:26 +00:31 | 59:38 -00:18 |
| Running 7 | 06:30 | 01:02:17 | 06:01 +00:29 | 01:02:04 +00:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:31 | 01:08:47 | 06:00 +00:31 | 01:08:05 +00:42 |
| Running 8 | 04:56 | 01:15:18 | 06:58 -02:02 | 01:14:05 +01:13 |
| Wall Balls | 09:30 | 01:20:14 | 07:49 +01:41 | 01:21:03 -00:49 |
| Roxzone | 07:31 | 01:37:08 | 08:16 -00:45 | 01:37:08 |
Graeme Flanagan showed a strong performance in the 2024 Dublin HYROX race. His overall rank placed him in the top 52% of all athletes and in the top 59% of his age group. Despite this, there is still room for improvement in certain areas. Graeme's total running time was faster than average, indicating a strength in running abilities. However, in the later stages of the race, his pace decreased in comparison to the average. This suggests that he may have started the race too fast, leading to fatigue in the latter stages.
Based on his performance, Graeme could benefit from a more conservative start to the race to conserve energy for the later stages. This would help maintain a more consistent pace throughout the race. He should also focus on improving his transition times and reducing rest periods between exercises, as his Roxzone time was faster than average, indicating potential for improvement in these areas. With a more balanced approach to the race and targeted training to improve his weak areas, Graeme could significantly improve his future HYROX performances.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Harrington Ben | 2024 Birmingham | 01:36:45 | |
| Mohammed Saeed | 2023 Dubai | 01:37:16 | |
| Kühberger Ronny | 2018 Wien | 01:36:39 | |
| Wijnands Thijs | 2024 Maastricht | 01:36:48 | |
| Akik Joseph | 2023 London | 01:37:36 | |
| Canwood Quinten | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:37:10 | |
| Banyols Andréa | 2024 Marseille | 01:37:32 | |
| Frostpennington Fraser | 2023 London | 01:37:29 | |
| Boll Frederic | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:37:34 | |
| Baker Stephen | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:37:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
