Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bruggink Tim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bruggink Tim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bruggink Tim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bruggink Tim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:26 | 53:11 to 46:45 | 96.7% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:12 to 05:02 | 2.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:03 | 06:16 to 06:13 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:43 to 02:43 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:57 to 01:57 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:26 to 05:26 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Bruggink Tim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:23 | 00:00 | 05:00 -00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 04:23 | 04:38 -00:12 | 05:00 -00:37 |
| Running 2 | 05:49 | 08:49 | 05:26 +00:23 | 09:38 -00:49 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 14:38 | 03:18 -00:35 | 15:04 -00:26 |
| Running 3 | 06:28 | 17:21 | 05:58 +00:30 | 18:22 -01:01 |
| Sled Pull | 04:44 | 23:49 | 05:42 -00:58 | 24:20 -00:31 |
| Running 4 | 06:23 | 28:33 | 05:57 +00:26 | 30:02 -01:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:16 | 34:56 | 06:24 -00:08 | 35:59 -01:03 |
| Running 5 | 07:33 | 41:12 | 06:13 +01:20 | 42:23 -01:11 |
| Rowing | 05:12 | 48:45 | 05:05 +00:07 | 48:36 +00:09 |
| Running 6 | 06:52 | 53:57 | 06:02 +00:50 | 53:41 +00:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 01:00:49 | 02:27 -00:30 | 59:43 +01:06 |
| Running 7 | 07:02 | 01:02:46 | 06:01 +01:01 | 01:02:10 +00:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:26 | 01:09:48 | 05:59 -00:33 | 01:08:11 +01:37 |
| Running 8 | 08:45 | 01:15:14 | 06:59 +01:46 | 01:14:10 +01:04 |
| Wall Balls | 05:24 | 01:23:59 | 07:50 -02:26 | 01:21:09 +02:50 |
| Roxzone | 08:00 | 01:37:14 | 08:15 -00:15 | 01:37:14 |
Tim Bruggink delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX race, achieving an overall rank of 1689, placing him in the top 54% of athletes. In his age group (30-34), he ranked 398th, positioning him in the top 59%. His overall time was 1:37:14. Analyzing the running performance, Tim's total running time was 53:11, which is 5:13 slower than the average. This suggests that his strengths lie more in the strength segments rather than running, where he exhibited notable proficiency, particularly in the Wall Balls segment, finishing significantly faster than the average. His initial running segments were relatively fast, indicating a tendency to start the race too quickly, potentially impacting his stamina in later segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jimenez Callealta David | 2022 Madrid | 01:37:10 | |
| Mendonca Justin | 2024 Brisbane | 01:37:15 | |
| Almousa Hassan | 2022 London | 01:37:28 | |
| O Sullivan Jamie | 2023 Dublin | 01:37:24 | |
| Lawson Michael | 2023 New York | 01:37:19 | |
| Deiser Rene | 2023 Dublin | 01:36:55 | |
| Loureiro Tiago | 2024 Madrid | 01:36:47 | |
| Taylor Marc | 2023 London | 01:37:20 | |
| Montgomery Lawrence | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:37:01 | |
| Lu Gene | 2024 New York | 01:37:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:41:52 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
