Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Benamati Emanuele's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Benamati Emanuele's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Benamati Emanuele's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Benamati Emanuele's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:49 | 07:37 to 05:48 | 50.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:58 | 06:26 to 05:28 | 26.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:38 | 05:52 to 05:14 | 17.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:11 | 03:15 to 03:04 | 5.0% |
| Run Total | 00:02 | 45:05 to 45:03 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:03 to 06:03 | 0.0% |
| Benamati Emanuele | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:16 | 00:00 | 04:51 +01:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 06:16 | 04:33 -00:19 | 04:51 +01:25 |
| Running 2 | 05:14 | 10:30 | 05:19 -00:05 | 09:24 +01:06 |
| Sled Push | 03:15 | 15:44 | 03:09 +00:06 | 14:43 +01:01 |
| Running 3 | 05:32 | 18:59 | 05:47 -00:15 | 17:52 +01:07 |
| Sled Pull | 05:52 | 24:31 | 05:26 +00:26 | 23:39 +00:52 |
| Running 4 | 05:38 | 30:23 | 05:48 -00:10 | 29:05 +01:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:37 | 36:01 | 06:03 +01:34 | 34:53 +01:08 |
| Running 5 | 05:46 | 43:38 | 06:00 -00:14 | 40:56 +02:42 |
| Rowing | 04:19 | 49:24 | 04:58 -00:39 | 46:56 +02:28 |
| Running 6 | 05:52 | 53:43 | 05:50 +00:02 | 51:54 +01:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 59:35 | 02:21 -00:21 | 57:44 +01:51 |
| Running 7 | 05:42 | 01:01:35 | 05:48 -00:06 | 01:00:05 +01:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:26 | 01:07:17 | 05:39 +00:47 | 01:05:53 +01:24 |
| Running 8 | 05:08 | 01:13:43 | 06:36 -01:28 | 01:11:32 +02:11 |
| Wall Balls | 06:03 | 01:18:51 | 07:21 -01:18 | 01:18:08 +00:43 |
| Roxzone | 08:32 | 01:33:20 | 07:51 +00:41 | 01:33:20 |
Emanuele Benamati delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Milan Hyrox event, ranking in the top 56% overall and top 62% in his age group. His total running time was 01:22 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. Despite this, certain strength segments posed challenges, suggesting an opportunity to enhance his strength component for a more balanced performance. His pacing strategy appeared conservative at the start, with Running 1 significantly slower than average, potentially indicating a cautious approach that may have affected momentum early in the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Weiss Patrick | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:33:20 | |
| Weiner Adam | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:32:58 | |
| Lee John | 2023 Singapore | 01:33:12 | |
| Elmer Greg | 2021 Chicago | 01:33:50 | |
| Anders Nils | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:33:17 | |
| Luckman Andy | 2024 Manchester | 01:33:18 | |
| Jackson Gareth | 2024 Milan | 01:33:39 | |
| Troon Chris | 2024 Brisbane | 01:33:30 | |
| Witt Nils | 2023 Hamburg | 01:32:58 | |
| Schols Martijn | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:32:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
