Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 61 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Den Brink Lucas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Den Brink Lucas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Den Brink Lucas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Den Brink Lucas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 22:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 16:10 | 01:15:49 to 59:39 | 70.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:46 | 12:53 to 09:07 | 16.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:44 | 10:10 to 08:26 | 7.6% |
| Wall Balls | 01:08 | 12:25 to 11:17 | 5.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:19 to 03:19 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:51 to 06:51 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:17 to 05:17 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:49 to 02:49 | 0.0% |
| Van Den Brink Lucas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:55 | 00:00 | 06:14 -01:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:40 | 04:55 | 05:10 -00:30 | 06:14 -01:19 |
| Running 2 | 10:11 | 09:35 | 07:39 +02:32 | 11:24 -01:49 |
| Sled Push | 03:19 | 19:46 | 04:54 -01:35 | 19:03 +00:43 |
| Running 3 | 10:36 | 23:05 | 08:22 +02:14 | 23:57 -00:52 |
| Sled Pull | 06:51 | 33:41 | 08:25 -01:34 | 32:19 +01:22 |
| Running 4 | 10:23 | 40:32 | 08:35 +01:48 | 40:44 -00:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 12:53 | 50:55 | 10:41 +02:12 | 49:19 +01:36 |
| Running 5 | 08:58 | 01:03:48 | 09:14 -00:16 | 01:00:00 +03:48 |
| Rowing | 05:17 | 01:12:46 | 05:51 -00:34 | 01:09:14 +03:32 |
| Running 6 | 10:42 | 01:18:03 | 08:58 +01:44 | 01:15:05 +02:58 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:49 | 01:28:45 | 03:18 -00:29 | 01:24:03 +04:42 |
| Running 7 | 09:24 | 01:31:34 | 08:57 +00:27 | 01:27:21 +04:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 10:10 | 01:40:58 | 10:02 +00:08 | 01:36:18 +04:40 |
| Running 8 | 10:44 | 01:51:08 | 12:32 -01:48 | 01:46:20 +04:48 |
| Wall Balls | 12:25 | 02:01:52 | 13:23 -00:58 | 01:58:52 +03:00 |
| Roxzone | 11:25 | 02:25:34 | 13:19 -01:54 | 02:25:34 |
Lucas Van Den Brink's performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race demonstrates both strengths and areas for improvement. His overall rank was 2199 out of 3118 athletes, placing him in the top 70%, while his age group rank was 285 out of 393, placing him in the top 72%. Lucas shows a strong start with excellent performance in initial running and strength segments, indicating a hybrid profile with a slight strength emphasis. However, his total running time was slower than average by 3:53, suggesting running endurance as a potential area for improvement. Additionally, his pacing strategy indicates he might have started too fast, as evidenced by his performance in early running segments compared to later ones.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 丹 尼 | 2024 Beijing | 02:25:55 | |
| Vujakovic Jaron | 2023 Manchester | 02:25:15 | |
| 周 子轩 | 2024 Beijing | 02:25:35 | |
| Reid Graham | 2022 London | 02:25:08 | |
| Guedes Miguel | 2024 Malaga | 02:25:28 | |
| Piekarski Paweł | 2024 Katowice | 02:25:10 | |
| Powell Philip | 2024 Melbourne | 02:25:22 | |
| Hopewell Mark | 2024 Glasgow | 02:25:45 | |
| Pingoy Anthony | 2024 New York | 02:25:21 | |
| Sarmento Antonio | 2024 Madrid | 02:25:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
