Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rawatan Cindy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rawatan Cindy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rawatan Cindy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rawatan Cindy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers Carry | 00:51 | 03:08 to 02:17 | 35.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:31 | 03:20 to 02:49 | 21.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:27 | 05:29 to 05:02 | 18.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:25 | 05:36 to 05:11 | 17.2% |
| Run Total | 00:11 | 48:01 to 47:50 | 7.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:45 to 05:45 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:27 to 05:27 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:21 to 05:21 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Rawatan Cindy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:52 | 00:00 | 05:22 +00:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:36 | 05:52 | 05:14 +00:22 | 05:22 +00:30 |
| Running 2 | 05:56 | 11:28 | 05:45 +00:11 | 10:36 +00:52 |
| Sled Push | 03:20 | 17:24 | 02:55 +00:25 | 16:21 +01:03 |
| Running 3 | 06:22 | 20:44 | 06:05 +00:17 | 19:16 +01:28 |
| Sled Pull | 05:45 | 27:06 | 06:12 -00:27 | 25:21 +01:45 |
| Running 4 | 06:10 | 32:51 | 06:05 +00:05 | 31:33 +01:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:27 | 39:01 | 06:47 -01:20 | 37:38 +01:23 |
| Running 5 | 06:01 | 44:28 | 06:14 -00:13 | 44:25 +00:03 |
| Rowing | 05:21 | 50:29 | 05:31 -00:10 | 50:39 -00:10 |
| Running 6 | 05:46 | 55:50 | 06:08 -00:22 | 56:10 -00:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:08 | 01:01:36 | 02:25 +00:43 | 01:02:18 -00:42 |
| Running 7 | 05:46 | 01:04:44 | 06:07 -00:21 | 01:04:43 +00:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:29 | 01:10:30 | 05:14 +00:15 | 01:10:50 -00:20 |
| Running 8 | 06:13 | 01:15:59 | 06:40 -00:27 | 01:16:04 -00:05 |
| Wall Balls | 04:42 | 01:22:12 | 05:31 -00:49 | 01:22:44 -00:32 |
| Roxzone | 09:09 | 01:35:53 | 07:38 +01:31 | 01:35:53 |
Cindy Rawatan delivered a strong performance at the 2024 Perth Hyrox race, finishing in the top 20% of her age group and overall, which is commendable. She demonstrated superior running capabilities, as indicated by her total running time being 1:14 faster than the average, suggesting that she has a runner profile. Despite her excellent running proficiency, there are opportunities to enhance her strength-based exercises and improve transitions in the Roxzone. Her pacing strategy seemed well-balanced, as she didn't start too fast or too slow compared to the average, maintaining a consistent pace throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pignatelli Sally | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:36:11 | |
| Allanson Kaylah | 2024 Brisbane | 01:36:13 | |
| Krusenberg Eva | 2024 Köln | 01:35:34 | |
| Thies Maren | 2018 Hamburg | 01:36:09 | |
| Zelaya Bernadette | 2024 New York | 01:35:39 | |
| Finta Regina | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:35:44 | |
| Klein Johanna Laura | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:35:24 | |
| Rijkhoff Rianne | 2022 Maastricht | 01:36:03 | |
| Sautner Elvira | 2024 Hamburg | 01:36:19 | |
| Rintamäki Nina | 2024 Hamburg | 01:35:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
