Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 344 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ottenschot Ciera's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ottenschot Ciera's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ottenschot Ciera's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ottenschot Ciera's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:20. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:49 | 59:13 to 55:24 | 60.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:41 | 08:03 to 06:22 | 26.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:50 | 03:38 to 02:48 | 13.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:43 to 02:43 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 08:15 to 08:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:53 to 05:53 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:21 to 06:21 | 0.0% |
| Ottenschot Ciera | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:48 | 00:00 | 06:01 -01:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:12 | 04:48 | 05:30 -00:18 | 06:01 -01:13 |
| Running 2 | 07:01 | 10:00 | 06:37 +00:24 | 11:31 -01:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 17:01 | 03:29 -00:46 | 18:08 -01:07 |
| Running 3 | 07:19 | 19:44 | 07:06 +00:13 | 21:37 -01:53 |
| Sled Pull | 04:52 | 27:03 | 07:37 -02:45 | 28:43 -01:40 |
| Running 4 | 07:34 | 31:55 | 07:08 +00:26 | 36:20 -04:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:15 | 39:29 | 08:55 -00:40 | 43:28 -03:59 |
| Running 5 | 08:16 | 47:44 | 07:25 +00:51 | 52:23 -04:39 |
| Rowing | 05:53 | 56:00 | 05:55 -00:02 | 59:48 -03:48 |
| Running 6 | 07:48 | 01:01:53 | 07:18 +00:30 | 01:05:43 -03:50 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:38 | 01:09:41 | 02:44 +00:54 | 01:13:01 -03:20 |
| Running 7 | 07:56 | 01:13:19 | 07:20 +00:36 | 01:15:45 -02:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:03 | 01:21:15 | 06:37 +01:26 | 01:23:05 -01:50 |
| Running 8 | 08:34 | 01:29:18 | 08:16 +00:18 | 01:29:42 -00:24 |
| Wall Balls | 06:21 | 01:37:52 | 07:11 -00:50 | 01:37:58 -00:06 |
| Roxzone | 10:48 | 01:54:53 | 09:44 +01:04 | 01:54:53 |
Ciera Ottenschot's performance in the 2024 New York Hyrox race places her in the top third of her age group and overall participants, showcasing her competitive edge among a large field of athletes. With an overall rank of 463 out of 1486 and an age group rank of 118 out of 333, Ciera demonstrates a balanced profile with a slight inclination towards strength-based challenges. Her total running time was slightly slower than average, indicating that while she has a strong running foundation, there is room for improvement in her endurance and pacing. Her initial running segment was significantly faster than average, suggesting a potentially too aggressive start that might have impacted her consistency in later running segments and transitions, as indicated by the slower Roxzone time.
By focusing on these targeted areas for improvement and implementing the suggested training strategies, Ciera Ottenschot can elevate her performance in future Hyrox races, moving closer to her peak athletic potential.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ng Chloe | 2024 Singapore | 01:55:14 | |
| Mcgrady Tori | 2024 Birmingham | 01:55:09 | |
| Salas Jessica | 2021 Chicago | 01:54:30 | |
| Altamirano Hervera Yathza | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:55:15 | |
| Angue Beyeme Jacky Fleur | 2023 Dubai | 01:54:45 | |
| Brownell Alicia | 2024 Sydney | 01:55:03 | |
| Berger Nadia | 2024 Milan | 01:54:32 | |
| Wood Anna | 2024 Dallas | 01:54:51 | |
| Hilliard Courtney | 2024 New York | 01:54:27 | |
| Neveling Michelle | 2024 London | 01:55:09 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
