Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire O Connor Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights O Connor Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the O Connor Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve O Connor Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:19 | 49:19 to 47:00 | 37.4% |
| Sled Pull | 02:04 | 07:40 to 05:36 | 33.3% |
| Wall Balls | 01:42 | 09:14 to 07:32 | 27.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:45 to 04:38 | 1.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:13 to 06:13 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:25 to 05:25 | 0.0% |
| O Connor Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:00 | 00:00 | 05:03 -01:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:45 | 04:00 | 04:38 +00:07 | 05:03 -01:03 |
| Running 2 | 05:16 | 08:45 | 05:29 -00:13 | 09:41 -00:56 |
| Sled Push | 02:13 | 14:01 | 03:17 -01:04 | 15:10 -01:09 |
| Running 3 | 09:38 | 16:14 | 06:02 +03:36 | 18:27 -02:13 |
| Sled Pull | 07:40 | 25:52 | 05:45 +01:55 | 24:29 +01:23 |
| Running 4 | 05:35 | 33:32 | 06:02 -00:27 | 30:14 +03:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:13 | 39:07 | 06:31 -00:18 | 36:16 +02:51 |
| Running 5 | 06:18 | 45:20 | 06:16 +00:02 | 42:47 +02:33 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 51:38 | 05:07 -00:11 | 49:03 +02:35 |
| Running 6 | 05:28 | 56:34 | 06:05 -00:37 | 54:10 +02:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 01:02:02 | 02:28 -00:24 | 01:00:15 +01:47 |
| Running 7 | 05:28 | 01:04:06 | 06:04 -00:36 | 01:02:43 +01:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:25 | 01:09:34 | 06:07 -00:42 | 01:08:47 +00:47 |
| Running 8 | 07:39 | 01:14:59 | 07:02 +00:37 | 01:14:54 +00:05 |
| Wall Balls | 09:14 | 01:22:38 | 07:52 +01:22 | 01:21:56 +00:42 |
| Roxzone | 06:27 | 01:38:12 | 08:24 -01:57 | 01:38:12 |
Andrew O Connor competed commendably in the 2024 Sydney Hyrox event, ranking in the top 56% overall and top 59% in his age group. His overall time was 01:38:12, with a total running time of 00:49:19, which was slightly slower than average by 00:59. This indicates that Andrew has a balanced profile with a slight strength advantage, as his running time was not significantly faster than his strength segments. Andrew's pacing strategy suggests he started off strong, particularly in the initial running segments, but experienced a slowdown in the middle of the race, notably during Running 3. This pattern indicates a need for endurance training to maintain pace throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Oele Jesse | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:37:48 | |
| Van Dooren Lenny | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:38:23 | |
| Pronk Max | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:37:46 | |
| Ludwig Matthias | 2023 München | 01:38:06 | |
| Driskell Joseph | 2024 Bilbao | 01:38:27 | |
| Salazar Juan | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:38:09 | |
| Konicke Kevin | 2018 Hamburg | 01:38:16 | |
| Charles Charlie | 2024 Madrid | 01:38:40 | |
| Rees Rob | 2024 Birmingham | 01:37:44 | |
| Cherry Dennis | 2023 Anaheim | 01:38:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
