Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mckenzie Annabelle's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mckenzie Annabelle's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mckenzie Annabelle's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mckenzie Annabelle's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:29 | 05:49 to 04:20 | 36.2% |
| Run Total | 01:20 | 44:53 to 43:33 | 32.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:36 | 05:59 to 05:23 | 14.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:23 | 02:25 to 02:02 | 9.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:15 | 02:40 to 02:25 | 6.1% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:14 to 05:11 | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Mckenzie Annabelle | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:36 | 00:00 | 05:00 -01:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 03:36 | 05:03 -00:21 | 05:00 -01:24 |
| Running 2 | 05:33 | 08:18 | 05:19 +00:14 | 10:03 -01:45 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 13:51 | 02:37 +00:03 | 15:22 -01:31 |
| Running 3 | 05:47 | 16:31 | 05:36 +00:11 | 17:59 -01:28 |
| Sled Pull | 04:55 | 22:18 | 05:30 -00:35 | 23:35 -01:17 |
| Running 4 | 05:39 | 27:13 | 05:38 +00:01 | 29:05 -01:52 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:59 | 32:52 | 05:45 +00:14 | 34:43 -01:51 |
| Running 5 | 05:53 | 38:51 | 05:46 +00:07 | 40:28 -01:37 |
| Rowing | 05:14 | 44:44 | 05:18 -00:04 | 46:14 -01:30 |
| Running 6 | 05:58 | 49:58 | 05:40 +00:18 | 51:32 -01:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:25 | 55:56 | 02:11 +00:14 | 57:12 -01:16 |
| Running 7 | 06:07 | 58:21 | 05:38 +00:29 | 59:23 -01:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:49 | 01:04:28 | 04:33 +01:16 | 01:05:01 -00:33 |
| Running 8 | 06:24 | 01:10:17 | 06:02 +00:22 | 01:09:34 +00:43 |
| Wall Balls | 03:59 | 01:16:41 | 04:43 -00:44 | 01:15:36 +01:05 |
| Roxzone | 06:20 | 01:26:51 | 06:32 -00:12 | 01:26:51 |
Annabelle Mckenzie delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 201, placing her in the top 19% of all athletes. Her total running time of 00:44:53 was 00:15 faster than average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, her performance in the strength-based exercises, particularly the Sandbag Lunges, suggests room for improvement in these areas. Annabelle's initial segment, Running 1, was significantly faster than the average, suggesting she started the race with a strong pace, though her pace declined in subsequent running segments. This indicates a potential need for better pacing strategies.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Meier Malgorzata | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:26:43 | |
| Torrance Stephanie | 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:14 | |
| Mousley Eleanor | 2024 Glasgow | 01:27:13 | |
| Pielenz Lisa | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:26:25 | |
| Smart Grace | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:26:38 | |
| Blaker Victoria | 2023 Manchester | 01:26:55 | |
| Ruf Corinne | 2024 Paris | 01:26:57 | |
| Barrowclough Roisin | 2024 London | 01:26:34 | |
| wild melanie | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:26:42 | |
| Galella Christiana | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:26:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:47:15 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
