Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hohlfeld David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hohlfeld David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hohlfeld David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hohlfeld David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:44 | 07:42 to 05:58 | 38.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:59 | 05:54 to 04:55 | 21.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:58 | 05:44 to 04:46 | 21.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:25 | 04:47 to 04:22 | 9.3% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 04:58 to 04:43 | 5.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 02:09 to 02:01 | 3.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:38 to 02:38 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:36 to 38:36 | 0.0% |
| Hohlfeld David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:44 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:47 | 04:44 | 04:25 +00:22 | 04:35 +00:09 |
| Running 2 | 04:34 | 09:31 | 04:55 -00:21 | 09:00 +00:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:38 | 14:05 | 02:51 -00:13 | 13:55 +00:10 |
| Running 3 | 04:43 | 16:43 | 05:21 -00:38 | 16:46 -00:03 |
| Sled Pull | 04:33 | 21:26 | 04:51 -00:18 | 22:07 -00:41 |
| Running 4 | 04:46 | 25:59 | 05:20 -00:34 | 26:58 -00:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:54 | 30:45 | 05:15 +00:39 | 32:18 -01:33 |
| Running 5 | 04:59 | 36:39 | 05:30 -00:31 | 37:33 -00:54 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 41:38 | 04:47 +00:11 | 43:03 -01:25 |
| Running 6 | 04:54 | 46:36 | 05:21 -00:27 | 47:50 -01:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 51:30 | 02:09 +00:00 | 53:11 -01:41 |
| Running 7 | 04:48 | 53:39 | 05:21 -00:33 | 55:20 -01:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:44 | 58:27 | 05:02 +00:42 | 01:00:41 -02:14 |
| Running 8 | 05:11 | 01:04:11 | 05:56 -00:45 | 01:05:43 -01:32 |
| Wall Balls | 07:42 | 01:09:22 | 06:25 +01:17 | 01:11:39 -02:17 |
| Roxzone | 07:51 | 01:24:47 | 06:43 +01:08 | 01:24:47 |
David Hohlfeld, competing in the HYROX event at Hamburg, has shown strong performance in certain areas, particularly running, while other areas require improvement. David's overall rank is in the top 56% of athletes, and his age group rank is in the top 66%, indicating a solid performance. His total running time is 03:56 faster than average, indicating a strong runner's profile. However, his roxzone time is 01:13 slower than average, suggesting a need for improved fitness and transition time.
David demonstrated a good pacing strategy throughout the race, starting at a slightly slower pace in Running 1 and increasing his speed in subsequent running segments. This strategy prevented him from burning out early in the race and allowed him to excel in the later stages.
Based on David's performance, the following strategies could be beneficial for future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Sergio | 2023 Bilbao | 01:24:18 | |
| Kelly Graham | 2024 Berlin | 01:25:03 | |
| Mullin Claude | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:24:22 | |
| Kellermeier Christoph | 2022 Bremen | 01:24:18 | |
| Stephenson Greg | 2023 Melbourne | 01:24:45 | |
| De Kam Joost | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:24:57 | |
| Castro Almada Luis Andrés | 2022 Valencia | 01:24:27 | |
| Hook Jerry | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:25:07 | |
| Walker Jack | 2023 Birmingham | 01:25:14 | |
| Finlayson Andrew | 2024 Glasgow | 01:24:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
