Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Squarzoni Corey's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Squarzoni Corey's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Squarzoni Corey's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Squarzoni Corey's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:39 | 39:57 to 38:18 | 32.2% |
| Sled Push | 01:35 | 03:57 to 02:22 | 30.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:43 | 04:47 to 04:04 | 14.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:32 | 04:46 to 04:14 | 10.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:31 | 04:45 to 04:14 | 10.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 01:56 to 01:49 | 2.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Squarzoni Corey | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:29 | 00:00 | 04:19 +00:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 04:29 | 04:20 -00:07 | 04:19 +00:10 |
| Running 2 | 04:35 | 08:42 | 04:37 -00:02 | 08:39 +00:03 |
| Sled Push | 03:57 | 13:17 | 02:40 +01:17 | 13:16 +00:01 |
| Running 3 | 04:59 | 17:14 | 05:00 -00:01 | 15:56 +01:18 |
| Sled Pull | 04:47 | 22:13 | 04:27 +00:20 | 20:56 +01:17 |
| Running 4 | 05:04 | 27:00 | 04:59 +00:05 | 25:23 +01:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:46 | 32:04 | 04:39 +00:07 | 30:22 +01:42 |
| Running 5 | 05:01 | 36:50 | 05:07 -00:06 | 35:01 +01:49 |
| Rowing | 04:16 | 41:51 | 04:39 -00:23 | 40:08 +01:43 |
| Running 6 | 05:09 | 46:07 | 05:01 +00:08 | 44:47 +01:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 51:16 | 02:01 -00:05 | 49:48 +01:28 |
| Running 7 | 05:01 | 53:12 | 05:00 +00:01 | 51:49 +01:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:45 | 58:13 | 04:34 +00:11 | 56:49 +01:24 |
| Running 8 | 05:43 | 01:02:58 | 05:26 +00:17 | 01:01:23 +01:35 |
| Wall Balls | 04:12 | 01:08:41 | 05:45 -01:33 | 01:06:49 +01:52 |
| Roxzone | 05:46 | 01:18:31 | 05:57 -00:11 | 01:18:31 |
In terms of pacing, Corey's overall running time of 00:39:57 was 01:22 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he may need to work on his overall fitness and transition time in order to improve his performance in the roxzone.
Additionally, Corey's best running lap time of 00:04:29 indicates that he has the potential to excel in running. However, his splits analysis shows that he lost time in several running segments, including Running 1 (00:18 slower than average), Running 4 (00:04 slower than average), and Running 6 (00:08 slower than average). To improve his overall running performance, Corey should focus on specific running training and drills.
Overall, Corey Squarzoni had a strong performance in the 2023 Milan Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running performance, especially in the identified segments, and implementing effective race strategies, he can further enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gerczuj Nandor | 2022 Wien | 01:18:45 | |
| Nicolas Dratschmidt | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:18:04 | |
| Bottrell Ryan | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:19:01 | |
| López Chavira Alonso | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:18:08 | |
| Llewellyn Ben | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:45 | |
| Terry Benjamin | 2024 Perth | 01:18:42 | |
| Page Stuart | 2024 Melbourne | 01:18:01 | |
| Lee Thomas | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:18 | |
| Stache Martin | 2022 London | 01:18:59 | |
| Valade Hugo | 2023 Paris | 01:18:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rimini | 01:08:32 | |
| 2024 Turin | 01:12:17 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
