Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:40 (From 48:45 to 44:05) | 72.5% |
| BBJ | 01:05 (From 06:40 to 05:35) | 16.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:37 (From 05:54 to 05:17) | 9.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 (From 04:34 to 04:30) | 1.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 01:51 to 01:51) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 04:42 to 04:42) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:52 to 04:52) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:08 to 02:08) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 04:52 to 04:52) | 0.0% |
| Rodenrijs Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:02 | 00:00 | 04:48 -00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 04:02 | 04:32 +00:02 | 04:48 -00:46 |
| Running 2 | 05:46 | 08:36 | 05:13 +00:33 | 09:20 -00:44 |
| Sled Push | 01:51 | 14:22 | 03:06 -01:15 | 14:33 -00:11 |
| Running 3 | 06:07 | 16:13 | 05:42 +00:25 | 17:39 -01:26 |
| Sled Pull | 04:42 | 22:20 | 05:18 -00:36 | 23:21 -01:01 |
| Running 4 | 06:25 | 27:02 | 05:40 +00:45 | 28:39 -01:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:40 | 33:27 | 05:53 +00:47 | 34:19 -00:52 |
| Running 5 | 06:41 | 40:07 | 05:52 +00:49 | 40:12 -00:05 |
| Rowing | 04:52 | 46:48 | 04:56 -00:04 | 46:04 +00:44 |
| Running 6 | 06:14 | 51:40 | 05:42 +00:32 | 51:00 +00:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 57:54 | 02:19 -00:11 | 56:42 +01:12 |
| Running 7 | 06:30 | 01:00:02 | 05:41 +00:49 | 59:01 +01:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:54 | 01:06:32 | 05:32 +00:22 | 01:04:42 +01:50 |
| Running 8 | 07:04 | 01:12:26 | 06:25 +00:39 | 01:10:14 +02:12 |
| Wall Balls | 04:52 | 01:19:30 | 07:07 -02:15 | 01:16:39 +02:51 |
| Roxzone | 07:08 | 01:31:22 | 07:36 -00:28 | 01:31:22 |
Nick Rodenrijs participated in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, achieving an overall rank of 1391, placing him in the top 44% of the 3118 athletes. In his age group, he ranked 336 out of 672, positioning him in the top 50%. His overall time was 01:31:22. His total running time was 00:48:45, which is notably 03:15 slower than the average, indicating that running may not be his strongest suit. However, Nick excelled in strength-based activities such as the Sled Push and Wall Balls, where he ranked in the top 3% and 4% respectively. This suggests that Nick has a more strength-oriented profile.
In terms of pacing, Nick started strong with his initial running segment (Running 1) being significantly faster than average, placing him in the 18th percentile. However, his subsequent running segments were slower, indicating a potential issue with pacing as he might have started too fast.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hiller Gabriel | 2022 Wien | 01:31:02 | |
| Nuzum Dre | 2021 Dallas | 01:31:07 | |
| Ireland Stewart | 2024 Madrid | 01:30:53 | |
| Dobbelaere Bart | 2024 Maastricht | 01:31:49 | |
| Zink Jake | 2021 Dallas | 01:31:50 | |
| Jones David | 2024 Melbourne | 01:31:47 | |
| Petermann Marcel | 2018 Essen | 01:31:47 | |
| Hirsch Jochen | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:31:19 | |
| Strathern Samuel | 2023 Manchester | 01:31:32 | |
| Diehl Andreas | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:31:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam Rodenrijs Nick | 01:44:58 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Rodenrijs Nick
