Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Stringer Ian's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Stringer Ian's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Stringer Ian's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Stringer Ian's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:01 | 09:13 to 07:12 | 38.5% |
| Sled Pull | 01:07 | 06:30 to 05:23 | 21.3% |
| Run Total | 00:55 | 46:47 to 45:52 | 17.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:28 | 05:03 to 04:35 | 8.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:19 | 03:28 to 03:09 | 6.1% |
| Rowing | 00:17 | 05:16 to 04:59 | 5.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:07 | 06:07 to 06:00 | 2.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Stringer Ian | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:53 | 00:00 | 04:58 +00:55 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:03 | 05:53 | 04:35 +00:28 | 04:58 +00:55 |
| Running 2 | 05:32 | 10:56 | 05:24 +00:08 | 09:33 +01:23 |
| Sled Push | 03:28 | 16:28 | 03:11 +00:17 | 14:57 +01:31 |
| Running 3 | 05:33 | 19:56 | 05:51 -00:18 | 18:08 +01:48 |
| Sled Pull | 06:30 | 25:29 | 05:31 +00:59 | 23:59 +01:30 |
| Running 4 | 05:49 | 31:59 | 05:52 -00:03 | 29:30 +02:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:07 | 37:48 | 06:14 -00:07 | 35:22 +02:26 |
| Running 5 | 06:01 | 43:55 | 06:05 -00:04 | 41:36 +02:19 |
| Rowing | 05:16 | 49:56 | 05:02 +00:14 | 47:41 +02:15 |
| Running 6 | 05:45 | 55:12 | 05:54 -00:09 | 52:43 +02:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 01:00:57 | 02:25 -00:21 | 58:37 +02:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:59 | 01:03:01 | 05:53 +00:06 | 01:01:02 +01:59 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:24 | 01:09:00 | 05:51 -01:27 | 01:06:55 +02:05 |
| Running 8 | 06:20 | 01:13:24 | 06:47 -00:27 | 01:12:46 +00:38 |
| Wall Balls | 09:13 | 01:19:44 | 07:32 +01:41 | 01:19:33 +00:11 |
| Roxzone | 06:22 | 01:35:10 | 08:05 -01:43 | 01:35:10 |
Ian Stringer's performance in the 2024 Glasgow Hyrox race places him commendably within the top half of all participants and the top 25% of his age group. His overall time of 01:35:10 is a strong showing, particularly noting his total running time of 00:46:52, which is faster than average by 00:07. This suggests a runner profile, indicating a strength in running events over strength-based exercises. However, his performance in the strength segments, particularly in Wall Balls, Sled Pull, and Ski Erg, suggests these are areas for improvement. Ian's pacing appeared to start slower in the initial running segment but improved significantly in later runs, indicating potential for better race start strategies.
Focusing on these areas of improvement with targeted training and race strategies, Ian Stringer can elevate his performance in future Hyrox races, potentially improving his overall and age group rankings.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Janin Keeran | 2023 Singapore | 01:34:56 | |
| Fernandez Nacho | 2024 Madrid | 01:35:34 | |
| Cheng Chi Hong | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:35:21 | |
| Rohrmoser Jens | 2018 Hamburg | 01:34:51 | |
| Kolerzak Marcin | 2024 Gdansk | 01:35:05 | |
| Kouchi Jeffrey | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:35:11 | |
| Baker Brian | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:35:25 | |
| GarciaGinovart Francisco | 2024 Madrid | 01:35:02 | |
| Mcnulty Thomas | 2022 New York | 01:35:05 | |
| McConnell Rory | 2024 Manchester | 01:34:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dublin | 01:46:17 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
