Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Strang Jeffrey's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Strang Jeffrey's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Strang Jeffrey's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Strang Jeffrey's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:01 | 40:19 to 38:18 | 41.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:42 | 04:46 to 04:04 | 14.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:35 | 02:57 to 02:22 | 12.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:33 | 04:47 to 04:14 | 11.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:28 | 02:17 to 01:49 | 9.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:14 | 04:28 to 04:14 | 4.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:24 to 04:13 | 3.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:08 | 05:22 to 05:14 | 2.7% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Strang Jeffrey | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:04 | 00:00 | 04:19 -01:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 03:04 | 04:20 +00:04 | 04:19 -01:15 |
| Running 2 | 04:31 | 07:28 | 04:37 -00:06 | 08:39 -01:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:57 | 11:59 | 02:40 +00:17 | 13:16 -01:17 |
| Running 3 | 04:58 | 14:56 | 05:00 -00:02 | 15:56 -01:00 |
| Sled Pull | 04:46 | 19:54 | 04:27 +00:19 | 20:56 -01:02 |
| Running 4 | 05:21 | 24:40 | 04:59 +00:22 | 25:23 -00:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:47 | 30:01 | 04:39 +00:08 | 30:22 -00:21 |
| Running 5 | 05:33 | 34:48 | 05:07 +00:26 | 35:01 -00:13 |
| Rowing | 04:27 | 40:21 | 04:39 -00:12 | 40:08 +00:13 |
| Running 6 | 05:30 | 44:48 | 05:01 +00:29 | 44:47 +00:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:17 | 50:18 | 02:01 +00:16 | 49:48 +00:30 |
| Running 7 | 05:31 | 52:35 | 05:00 +00:31 | 51:49 +00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:28 | 58:06 | 04:34 -00:06 | 56:49 +01:17 |
| Running 8 | 05:56 | 01:02:34 | 05:26 +00:30 | 01:01:23 +01:11 |
| Wall Balls | 05:22 | 01:08:30 | 05:45 -00:23 | 01:06:49 +01:41 |
| Roxzone | 04:48 | 01:18:31 | 05:57 -01:09 | 01:18:31 |
In terms of his splits, Strang performed exceptionally well in Running 1, Ski Erg, Running 2, Sled Push, Running 3, Rowing, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls. These splits were either faster than average or only slightly slower, showcasing his strength and proficiency in these areas.
However, there were several segments where Strang lost time compared to the average athlete. The segments with the most time lost were Running Total, Running 7, Running 6, Burpees Broad Jump, Running 5, Running 8, Running 4, and Farmers Carry. These segments should be the focus of improvement for Strang to enhance his overall race performance.
By focusing on these areas of improvement and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, Jeffrey Strang can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races and continue to excel in his age group.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Choi Wonjun | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:18:54 | |
| Morand Benoit | 2024 Marseille | 01:18:11 | |
| Thomas Connor | 2023 Birmingham | 01:18:07 | |
| Degeyter Brice | 2024 Singapore | 01:19:01 | |
| 김 지홍 | 2024 Incheon | 01:18:36 | |
| Royce Hamish | 2024 Melbourne | 01:18:27 | |
| Burrows Joel | 2023 Chicago | 01:18:52 | |
| Baylon Joshua | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:05 | |
| Marshall Richard | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:02 | |
| Gargiulo Tommy | 2024 New York | 01:18:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
